Immigrants from Costa Rica vs Turkish Married-Couple Family Poverty

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 203,682,696 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Costa Rica and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.151 and weighted average of 5.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 270,078,353 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Turks and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.361 and weighted average of 4.3%, a difference of 26.0%.

Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Summary

Measurement	Immigrants from Costa Rica	Turkish
Minimum	0.67%	0.78%
Maximum	22.7%	16.2%
Range	22.1%	15.5%
Mean	5.8%	4.6%
Median	5.0%	3.6%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	3.1%	2.6%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	6.6%	4.9%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	3.5%	2.4%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	4.7%	3.6%
Standard Deviation (Population)	4.7%	3.5%

Similar Demographics by Married-Couple Family Poverty

Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Costa Rica by Married-Couple Family Poverty

In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Costa Rica are Chippewa (5.4%, a difference of 0.080%), Osage (5.4%, a difference of 0.19%), Immigrants from Africa (5.5%, a difference of 0.33%), Immigrants from Peru (5.4%, a difference of 0.41%), and French American Indian (5.5%, a difference of 0.64%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Married-Couple Family Poverty
Liberians	26.3 /100 \| #197	Fair 5.4%
Immigrants \| Belarus	26.2 /100 \| #198	Fair 5.4%
Uruguayans	25.0 /100 \| #199	Fair 5.4%
Immigrants \| Morocco	24.3 /100 \| #200	Fair 5.4%
Lebanese	24.1 /100 \| #201	Fair 5.4%
Immigrants \| Middle Africa	23.8 /100 \| #202	Fair 5.4%
Immigrants \| Peru	21.8 /100 \| #203	Fair 5.4%
Immigrants \| Costa Rica	19.4 /100 \| #204	Poor 5.4%
Chippewa	18.9 /100 \| #205	Poor 5.4%
Osage	18.4 /100 \| #206	Poor 5.4%
Immigrants \| Africa	17.6 /100 \| #207	Poor 5.5%
French American Indians	16.1 /100 \| #208	Poor 5.5%
Immigrants \| Syria	15.4 /100 \| #209	Poor 5.5%
Immigrants \| Micronesia	14.4 /100 \| #210	Poor 5.5%
Nigerians	14.3 /100 \| #211	Poor 5.5%

Demographics Similar to Turks by Married-Couple Family Poverty

In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Turks are Australian (4.3%, a difference of 0.080%), Burmese (4.3%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Lithuania (4.3%, a difference of 0.11%), Russian (4.3%, a difference of 0.13%), and Immigrants from South Central Asia (4.3%, a difference of 0.15%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Married-Couple Family Poverty
Scottish	99.8 /100 \| #42	Exceptional 4.3%
Swiss	99.8 /100 \| #43	Exceptional 4.3%
Immigrants \| Japan	99.8 /100 \| #44	Exceptional 4.3%
Serbians	99.8 /100 \| #45	Exceptional 4.3%
British	99.8 /100 \| #46	Exceptional 4.3%
Immigrants \| South Central Asia	99.8 /100 \| #47	Exceptional 4.3%
Australians	99.7 /100 \| #48	Exceptional 4.3%
Turks	99.7 /100 \| #49	Exceptional 4.3%
Burmese	99.7 /100 \| #50	Exceptional 4.3%
Immigrants \| Lithuania	99.7 /100 \| #51	Exceptional 4.3%
Russians	99.7 /100 \| #52	Exceptional 4.3%
Welsh	99.7 /100 \| #53	Exceptional 4.3%
Austrians	99.7 /100 \| #54	Exceptional 4.3%
French	99.7 /100 \| #55	Exceptional 4.3%
Immigrants \| Zimbabwe	99.7 /100 \| #56	Exceptional 4.3%