Tohono O'odham vs Immigrants from Jordan Married-Couple Family Poverty
COMPARE
Tohono O'odham
Immigrants from Jordan
Married-Couple Family Poverty
Married-Couple Family Poverty Comparison
Tohono O'odham
Immigrants from Jordan
11.2%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
342nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
5.1%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
66.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
162nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Tohono O'odham vs Immigrants from Jordan Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 58,693,710 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Tohono O'odham and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.568 and weighted average of 11.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 180,872,287 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Jordan and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.304 and weighted average of 5.1%, a difference of 119.4%.

Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Tohono O'odham | Immigrants from Jordan |
| Minimum | 5.8% | 1.7% |
| Maximum | 71.6% | 25.3% |
| Range | 65.8% | 23.5% |
| Mean | 23.0% | 6.5% |
| Median | 14.7% | 4.6% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 9.4% | 3.7% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 31.2% | 7.3% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 21.8% | 3.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 18.6% | 4.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 18.2% | 4.9% |
Similar Demographics by Married-Couple Family Poverty
Demographics Similar to Tohono O'odham by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Tohono O'odham are Pueblo (11.1%, a difference of 0.93%), Pima (11.4%, a difference of 1.7%), Navajo (11.9%, a difference of 5.6%), Puerto Rican (12.6%, a difference of 12.6%), and Immigrants from Yemen (12.8%, a difference of 14.1%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
| Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 8.3% |
| Immigrants | Dominican Republic | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 8.4% |
| Sioux | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 8.7% |
| Apache | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 9.0% |
| Yakama | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 9.0% |
| Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 9.4% |
| Crow | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 9.6% |
| Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 9.7% |
| Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 11.1% |
| Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 11.2% |
| Pima | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 11.4% |
| Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 11.9% |
| Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 12.6% |
| Immigrants | Yemen | 0.0 /100 | #346 | Tragic 12.8% |
| Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #347 | Tragic 13.4% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Jordan by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Jordan are Ethiopian (5.1%, a difference of 0.22%), Pennsylvania German (5.1%, a difference of 0.27%), Sierra Leonean (5.1%, a difference of 0.31%), Immigrants from South Eastern Asia (5.1%, a difference of 0.53%), and Immigrants from Saudi Arabia (5.1%, a difference of 0.53%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
| Immigrants | Ethiopia | 72.4 /100 | #155 | Good 5.1% |
| Sri Lankans | 72.2 /100 | #156 | Good 5.1% |
| Argentineans | 70.7 /100 | #157 | Good 5.1% |
| Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 70.4 /100 | #158 | Good 5.1% |
| Immigrants | Saudi Arabia | 70.3 /100 | #159 | Good 5.1% |
| Pennsylvania Germans | 68.5 /100 | #160 | Good 5.1% |
| Ethiopians | 68.1 /100 | #161 | Good 5.1% |
| Immigrants | Jordan | 66.5 /100 | #162 | Good 5.1% |
| Sierra Leoneans | 64.1 /100 | #163 | Good 5.1% |
| Hawaiians | 62.3 /100 | #164 | Good 5.1% |
| Immigrants | Malaysia | 62.2 /100 | #165 | Good 5.1% |
| Paraguayans | 61.5 /100 | #166 | Good 5.1% |
| Costa Ricans | 61.5 /100 | #167 | Good 5.1% |
| Immigrants | Uganda | 54.9 /100 | #168 | Average 5.2% |
| Ottawa | 54.5 /100 | #169 | Average 5.2% |