Samoan vs Chinese Married-Couple Family Poverty
COMPARE
Samoan
Chinese
Married-Couple Family Poverty
Married-Couple Family Poverty Comparison
Samoans
Chinese
4.9%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
90.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
134th/ 347
METRIC RANK
3.6%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
2nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Samoan vs Chinese Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 224,354,255 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Samoans and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.180 and weighted average of 4.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 64,670,469 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Chinese and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.040 and weighted average of 3.6%, a difference of 33.9%.
Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Samoan | Chinese |
| Minimum | 0.90% | 0.44% |
| Maximum | 26.3% | 17.1% |
| Range | 25.4% | 16.7% |
| Mean | 5.3% | 4.2% |
| Median | 4.8% | 3.3% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 3.3% | 2.2% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 6.0% | 4.1% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.7% | 1.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.7% | 3.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.6% | 3.4% |
Similar Demographics by Married-Couple Family Poverty
Demographics Similar to Samoans by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Samoans are Immigrants from Kenya (4.9%, a difference of 0.010%), Puget Sound Salish (4.9%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Eastern Europe (4.9%, a difference of 0.090%), Soviet Union (4.9%, a difference of 0.16%), and Immigrants from Pakistan (4.9%, a difference of 0.17%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
| Egyptians | 92.0 /100 | #127 | Exceptional 4.8% |
| Palestinians | 91.2 /100 | #128 | Exceptional 4.9% |
| Immigrants | Pakistan | 90.7 /100 | #129 | Exceptional 4.9% |
| Soviet Union | 90.7 /100 | #130 | Exceptional 4.9% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Europe | 90.5 /100 | #131 | Exceptional 4.9% |
| Puget Sound Salish | 90.4 /100 | #132 | Exceptional 4.9% |
| Immigrants | Kenya | 90.2 /100 | #133 | Exceptional 4.9% |
| Samoans | 90.2 /100 | #134 | Exceptional 4.9% |
| Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs | 89.4 /100 | #135 | Excellent 4.9% |
| Immigrants | Hungary | 88.7 /100 | #136 | Excellent 4.9% |
| Guamanians/Chamorros | 86.5 /100 | #137 | Excellent 4.9% |
| Chileans | 86.0 /100 | #138 | Excellent 4.9% |
| German Russians | 85.1 /100 | #139 | Excellent 5.0% |
| Immigrants | Portugal | 84.8 /100 | #140 | Excellent 5.0% |
| Immigrants | Brazil | 84.6 /100 | #141 | Excellent 5.0% |
Demographics Similar to Chinese by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chinese are Immigrants from India (3.6%, a difference of 0.18%), Norwegian (3.7%, a difference of 1.9%), Slovene (3.8%, a difference of 5.6%), Swedish (3.9%, a difference of 5.7%), and Luxembourger (3.9%, a difference of 6.4%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
| Immigrants | India | 100.0 /100 | #1 | Exceptional 3.6% |
| Chinese | 100.0 /100 | #2 | Exceptional 3.6% |
| Norwegians | 100.0 /100 | #3 | Exceptional 3.7% |
| Slovenes | 100.0 /100 | #4 | Exceptional 3.8% |
| Swedes | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 3.9% |
| Luxembourgers | 100.0 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 3.9% |
| Latvians | 100.0 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 3.9% |
| Thais | 100.0 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 3.9% |
| Croatians | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 3.9% |
| Carpatho Rusyns | 100.0 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 3.9% |
| Lithuanians | 100.0 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 4.0% |
| Bulgarians | 100.0 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 4.0% |
| Czechs | 100.0 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 4.0% |
| Slovaks | 100.0 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 4.0% |
| Poles | 100.0 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 4.0% |