Maltese vs Immigrants from Oceania Married-Couple Family Poverty

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 125,965,353 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Maltese and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.474 and weighted average of 4.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 303,370,151 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Oceania and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.099 and weighted average of 5.0%, a difference of 23.1%.

Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Summary

Measurement	Maltese	Immigrants from Oceania
Minimum	0.56%	1.0%
Maximum	31.1%	12.9%
Range	30.6%	11.9%
Mean	4.7%	6.0%
Median	3.3%	5.1%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	2.5%	4.2%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	4.5%	7.4%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	2.0%	3.2%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	6.0%	2.8%
Standard Deviation (Population)	5.9%	2.7%

Similar Demographics by Married-Couple Family Poverty

Demographics Similar to Maltese by Married-Couple Family Poverty

In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Maltese are Zimbabwean (4.1%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Ireland (4.1%, a difference of 0.25%), Immigrants from Singapore (4.1%, a difference of 0.40%), Bhutanese (4.1%, a difference of 0.42%), and Eastern European (4.1%, a difference of 0.65%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Married-Couple Family Poverty
Czechs	100.0 /100 \| #13	Exceptional 4.0%
Slovaks	100.0 /100 \| #14	Exceptional 4.0%
Poles	100.0 /100 \| #15	Exceptional 4.0%
Germans	100.0 /100 \| #16	Exceptional 4.0%
Filipinos	100.0 /100 \| #17	Exceptional 4.0%
Italians	100.0 /100 \| #18	Exceptional 4.0%
Immigrants \| Ireland	99.9 /100 \| #19	Exceptional 4.1%
Maltese	99.9 /100 \| #20	Exceptional 4.1%
Zimbabweans	99.9 /100 \| #21	Exceptional 4.1%
Immigrants \| Singapore	99.9 /100 \| #22	Exceptional 4.1%
Bhutanese	99.9 /100 \| #23	Exceptional 4.1%
Eastern Europeans	99.9 /100 \| #24	Exceptional 4.1%
Immigrants \| Taiwan	99.9 /100 \| #25	Exceptional 4.1%
Cypriots	99.9 /100 \| #26	Exceptional 4.1%
Danes	99.9 /100 \| #27	Exceptional 4.1%

Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Oceania by Married-Couple Family Poverty

In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Oceania are Syrian (5.0%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Russia (5.0%, a difference of 0.030%), Brazilian (5.0%, a difference of 0.050%), Mongolian (5.0%, a difference of 0.22%), and Immigrants from Cameroon (5.0%, a difference of 0.23%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Married-Couple Family Poverty
Immigrants \| China	84.6 /100 \| #142	Excellent 5.0%
Immigrants \| Egypt	83.4 /100 \| #143	Excellent 5.0%
Hmong	83.2 /100 \| #144	Excellent 5.0%
Immigrants \| Spain	79.9 /100 \| #145	Good 5.0%
Mongolians	79.8 /100 \| #146	Good 5.0%
Syrians	78.7 /100 \| #147	Good 5.0%
Immigrants \| Russia	78.7 /100 \| #148	Good 5.0%
Immigrants \| Oceania	78.6 /100 \| #149	Good 5.0%
Brazilians	78.3 /100 \| #150	Good 5.0%
Immigrants \| Cameroon	77.3 /100 \| #151	Good 5.0%
Albanians	77.2 /100 \| #152	Good 5.0%
Immigrants \| Kuwait	76.3 /100 \| #153	Good 5.0%
Delaware	73.7 /100 \| #154	Good 5.1%
Immigrants \| Ethiopia	72.4 /100 \| #155	Good 5.1%
Sri Lankans	72.2 /100 \| #156	Good 5.1%