Chinese vs Immigrants from Oceania Married-Couple Family Poverty

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 64,670,469 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Chinese and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.040 and weighted average of 3.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 303,370,151 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Oceania and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.099 and weighted average of 5.0%, a difference of 37.7%.

Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Summary

Measurement	Chinese	Immigrants from Oceania
Minimum	0.44%	1.0%
Maximum	17.1%	12.9%
Range	16.7%	11.9%
Mean	4.2%	6.0%
Median	3.3%	5.1%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	2.2%	4.2%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	4.1%	7.4%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	1.9%	3.2%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	3.4%	2.8%
Standard Deviation (Population)	3.4%	2.7%

Similar Demographics by Married-Couple Family Poverty

Demographics Similar to Chinese by Married-Couple Family Poverty

In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chinese are Immigrants from India (3.6%, a difference of 0.18%), Norwegian (3.7%, a difference of 1.9%), Slovene (3.8%, a difference of 5.6%), Swedish (3.9%, a difference of 5.7%), and Luxembourger (3.9%, a difference of 6.4%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Married-Couple Family Poverty
Immigrants \| India	100.0 /100 \| #1	Exceptional 3.6%
Chinese	100.0 /100 \| #2	Exceptional 3.6%
Norwegians	100.0 /100 \| #3	Exceptional 3.7%
Slovenes	100.0 /100 \| #4	Exceptional 3.8%
Swedes	100.0 /100 \| #5	Exceptional 3.9%
Luxembourgers	100.0 /100 \| #6	Exceptional 3.9%
Latvians	100.0 /100 \| #7	Exceptional 3.9%
Thais	100.0 /100 \| #8	Exceptional 3.9%
Croatians	100.0 /100 \| #9	Exceptional 3.9%
Carpatho Rusyns	100.0 /100 \| #10	Exceptional 3.9%
Lithuanians	100.0 /100 \| #11	Exceptional 4.0%
Bulgarians	100.0 /100 \| #12	Exceptional 4.0%
Czechs	100.0 /100 \| #13	Exceptional 4.0%
Slovaks	100.0 /100 \| #14	Exceptional 4.0%
Poles	100.0 /100 \| #15	Exceptional 4.0%

Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Oceania by Married-Couple Family Poverty

In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Oceania are Syrian (5.0%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Russia (5.0%, a difference of 0.030%), Brazilian (5.0%, a difference of 0.050%), Mongolian (5.0%, a difference of 0.22%), and Immigrants from Cameroon (5.0%, a difference of 0.23%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Married-Couple Family Poverty
Immigrants \| China	84.6 /100 \| #142	Excellent 5.0%
Immigrants \| Egypt	83.4 /100 \| #143	Excellent 5.0%
Hmong	83.2 /100 \| #144	Excellent 5.0%
Immigrants \| Spain	79.9 /100 \| #145	Good 5.0%
Mongolians	79.8 /100 \| #146	Good 5.0%
Syrians	78.7 /100 \| #147	Good 5.0%
Immigrants \| Russia	78.7 /100 \| #148	Good 5.0%
Immigrants \| Oceania	78.6 /100 \| #149	Good 5.0%
Brazilians	78.3 /100 \| #150	Good 5.0%
Immigrants \| Cameroon	77.3 /100 \| #151	Good 5.0%
Albanians	77.2 /100 \| #152	Good 5.0%
Immigrants \| Kuwait	76.3 /100 \| #153	Good 5.0%
Delaware	73.7 /100 \| #154	Good 5.1%
Immigrants \| Ethiopia	72.4 /100 \| #155	Good 5.1%
Sri Lankans	72.2 /100 \| #156	Good 5.1%