Kenyan vs Norwegian Married-Couple Family Poverty
COMPARE
Kenyan
Norwegian
Married-Couple Family Poverty
Married-Couple Family Poverty Comparison
Kenyans
Norwegians
4.8%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
94.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
117th/ 347
METRIC RANK
3.7%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
3rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Kenyan vs Norwegian Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 167,574,201 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Kenyans and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.577 and weighted average of 4.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 522,229,251 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Norwegians and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.355 and weighted average of 3.7%, a difference of 28.7%.
Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Kenyan | Norwegian |
Minimum | 0.40% | 1.2% |
Maximum | 18.8% | 50.0% |
Range | 18.3% | 48.8% |
Mean | 5.1% | 5.1% |
Median | 4.4% | 3.4% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 3.0% | 2.7% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 6.3% | 4.4% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.3% | 1.7% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.7% | 7.2% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.6% | 7.1% |
Similar Demographics by Married-Couple Family Poverty
Demographics Similar to Kenyans by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Kenyans are Immigrants from Philippines (4.8%, a difference of 0.020%), Celtic (4.8%, a difference of 0.10%), Taiwanese (4.8%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Indonesia (4.8%, a difference of 0.26%), and Immigrants from Eastern Asia (4.8%, a difference of 0.39%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
Immigrants | Bolivia | 96.2 /100 | #110 | Exceptional 4.7% |
Pakistanis | 96.2 /100 | #111 | Exceptional 4.7% |
Tongans | 95.9 /100 | #112 | Exceptional 4.7% |
Immigrants | Nepal | 95.9 /100 | #113 | Exceptional 4.7% |
Immigrants | Indonesia | 95.1 /100 | #114 | Exceptional 4.8% |
Taiwanese | 94.8 /100 | #115 | Exceptional 4.8% |
Celtics | 94.8 /100 | #116 | Exceptional 4.8% |
Kenyans | 94.7 /100 | #117 | Exceptional 4.8% |
Immigrants | Philippines | 94.6 /100 | #118 | Exceptional 4.8% |
Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 94.0 /100 | #119 | Exceptional 4.8% |
Immigrants | Southern Europe | 93.4 /100 | #120 | Exceptional 4.8% |
Indians (Asian) | 93.2 /100 | #121 | Exceptional 4.8% |
Whites/Caucasians | 93.1 /100 | #122 | Exceptional 4.8% |
Jordanians | 93.1 /100 | #123 | Exceptional 4.8% |
Romanians | 92.5 /100 | #124 | Exceptional 4.8% |
Demographics Similar to Norwegians by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Norwegians are Chinese (3.6%, a difference of 1.9%), Immigrants from India (3.6%, a difference of 2.1%), Slovene (3.8%, a difference of 3.6%), Swedish (3.9%, a difference of 3.8%), and Luxembourger (3.9%, a difference of 4.4%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
Immigrants | India | 100.0 /100 | #1 | Exceptional 3.6% |
Chinese | 100.0 /100 | #2 | Exceptional 3.6% |
Norwegians | 100.0 /100 | #3 | Exceptional 3.7% |
Slovenes | 100.0 /100 | #4 | Exceptional 3.8% |
Swedes | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 3.9% |
Luxembourgers | 100.0 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 3.9% |
Latvians | 100.0 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 3.9% |
Thais | 100.0 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 3.9% |
Croatians | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 3.9% |
Carpatho Rusyns | 100.0 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 3.9% |
Lithuanians | 100.0 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 4.0% |
Bulgarians | 100.0 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 4.0% |
Czechs | 100.0 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 4.0% |
Slovaks | 100.0 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 4.0% |
Poles | 100.0 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 4.0% |