Icelander vs Chickasaw Family Poverty
COMPARE
Icelander
Chickasaw
Family Poverty
Family Poverty Comparison
Icelanders
Chickasaw
8.3%
FAMILY POVERTY
90.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
126th/ 347
METRIC RANK
10.8%
FAMILY POVERTY
0.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
256th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Icelander vs Chickasaw Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 159,459,929 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Icelanders and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.255 and weighted average of 8.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,601,652 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.000 and weighted average of 10.8%, a difference of 29.9%.
Family Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Icelander | Chickasaw |
Minimum | 0.72% | 3.7% |
Maximum | 55.4% | 33.3% |
Range | 54.6% | 29.7% |
Mean | 10.9% | 12.7% |
Median | 7.0% | 12.0% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.4% | 9.8% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 11.2% | 14.5% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.7% | 4.7% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 12.2% | 5.3% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 12.0% | 5.2% |
Similar Demographics by Family Poverty
Demographics Similar to Icelanders by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Icelanders are Immigrants from Hungary (8.4%, a difference of 0.13%), Pakistani (8.3%, a difference of 0.20%), Soviet Union (8.3%, a difference of 0.24%), Argentinean (8.4%, a difference of 0.27%), and Palestinian (8.3%, a difference of 0.34%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
French | 92.8 /100 | #119 | Exceptional 8.3% |
Immigrants | Egypt | 91.6 /100 | #120 | Exceptional 8.3% |
Native Hawaiians | 91.3 /100 | #121 | Exceptional 8.3% |
Paraguayans | 91.2 /100 | #122 | Exceptional 8.3% |
Palestinians | 91.1 /100 | #123 | Exceptional 8.3% |
Soviet Union | 90.8 /100 | #124 | Exceptional 8.3% |
Pakistanis | 90.8 /100 | #125 | Exceptional 8.3% |
Icelanders | 90.3 /100 | #126 | Exceptional 8.3% |
Immigrants | Hungary | 89.9 /100 | #127 | Excellent 8.4% |
Argentineans | 89.6 /100 | #128 | Excellent 8.4% |
Portuguese | 89.2 /100 | #129 | Excellent 8.4% |
Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 88.6 /100 | #130 | Excellent 8.4% |
Puget Sound Salish | 88.6 /100 | #131 | Excellent 8.4% |
Immigrants | Argentina | 88.2 /100 | #132 | Excellent 8.4% |
Sri Lankans | 86.6 /100 | #133 | Excellent 8.5% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Immigrants from Ghana (10.8%, a difference of 0.040%), Subsaharan African (10.9%, a difference of 0.070%), Mexican American Indian (10.9%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Liberia (10.8%, a difference of 0.26%), and Bangladeshi (10.9%, a difference of 0.46%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
Cubans | 0.4 /100 | #249 | Tragic 10.6% |
Salvadorans | 0.3 /100 | #250 | Tragic 10.7% |
Iroquois | 0.3 /100 | #251 | Tragic 10.7% |
Immigrants | Zaire | 0.3 /100 | #252 | Tragic 10.7% |
Immigrants | Western Africa | 0.3 /100 | #253 | Tragic 10.7% |
Ecuadorians | 0.2 /100 | #254 | Tragic 10.8% |
Immigrants | Liberia | 0.2 /100 | #255 | Tragic 10.8% |
Chickasaw | 0.2 /100 | #256 | Tragic 10.8% |
Immigrants | Ghana | 0.2 /100 | #257 | Tragic 10.8% |
Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.2 /100 | #258 | Tragic 10.9% |
Mexican American Indians | 0.2 /100 | #259 | Tragic 10.9% |
Bangladeshis | 0.2 /100 | #260 | Tragic 10.9% |
Shoshone | 0.2 /100 | #261 | Tragic 10.9% |
Spanish American Indians | 0.2 /100 | #262 | Tragic 10.9% |
Cape Verdeans | 0.1 /100 | #263 | Tragic 10.9% |