Immigrants from Bahamas vs Chickasaw Family Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Bahamas
Chickasaw
Family Poverty
Family Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Bahamas
Chickasaw
11.1%
FAMILY POVERTY
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
271st/ 347
METRIC RANK
10.8%
FAMILY POVERTY
0.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
256th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Bahamas vs Chickasaw Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 104,583,559 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Bahamas and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.292 and weighted average of 11.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,601,652 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.000 and weighted average of 10.8%, a difference of 2.7%.
Family Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Bahamas | Chickasaw |
Minimum | 1.5% | 3.7% |
Maximum | 26.2% | 33.3% |
Range | 24.7% | 29.7% |
Mean | 12.3% | 12.7% |
Median | 11.4% | 12.0% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 9.8% | 9.8% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 13.7% | 14.5% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.9% | 4.7% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.6% | 5.3% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.5% | 5.2% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Bahamas and Chickasaw by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Bahamas are Immigrants from Jamaica (11.2%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Ecuador (11.1%, a difference of 0.25%), Immigrants from Nicaragua (11.1%, a difference of 0.25%), Somali (11.2%, a difference of 0.61%), and Jamaican (11.1%, a difference of 0.73%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Immigrants from Ghana (10.8%, a difference of 0.040%), Subsaharan African (10.9%, a difference of 0.070%), Mexican American Indian (10.9%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Liberia (10.8%, a difference of 0.26%), and Bangladeshi (10.9%, a difference of 0.46%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
Immigrants | Western Africa | 0.3 /100 | #253 | Tragic 10.7% |
Ecuadorians | 0.2 /100 | #254 | Tragic 10.8% |
Immigrants | Liberia | 0.2 /100 | #255 | Tragic 10.8% |
Chickasaw | 0.2 /100 | #256 | Tragic 10.8% |
Immigrants | Ghana | 0.2 /100 | #257 | Tragic 10.8% |
Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.2 /100 | #258 | Tragic 10.9% |
Mexican American Indians | 0.2 /100 | #259 | Tragic 10.9% |
Bangladeshis | 0.2 /100 | #260 | Tragic 10.9% |
Shoshone | 0.2 /100 | #261 | Tragic 10.9% |
Spanish American Indians | 0.2 /100 | #262 | Tragic 10.9% |
Cape Verdeans | 0.1 /100 | #263 | Tragic 10.9% |
Trinidadians and Tobagonians | 0.1 /100 | #264 | Tragic 10.9% |
Immigrants | Trinidad and Tobago | 0.1 /100 | #265 | Tragic 10.9% |
Immigrants | El Salvador | 0.1 /100 | #266 | Tragic 11.0% |
Comanche | 0.1 /100 | #267 | Tragic 11.0% |
Jamaicans | 0.1 /100 | #268 | Tragic 11.1% |
Immigrants | Ecuador | 0.1 /100 | #269 | Tragic 11.1% |
Immigrants | Nicaragua | 0.1 /100 | #270 | Tragic 11.1% |
Immigrants | Bahamas | 0.1 /100 | #271 | Tragic 11.1% |
Immigrants | Jamaica | 0.1 /100 | #272 | Tragic 11.2% |
Somalis | 0.1 /100 | #273 | Tragic 11.2% |