Australian vs Chickasaw Family Poverty
COMPARE
Australian
Chickasaw
Family Poverty
Family Poverty Comparison
Australians
Chickasaw
7.8%
FAMILY POVERTY
98.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
68th/ 347
METRIC RANK
10.8%
FAMILY POVERTY
0.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
256th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Australian vs Chickasaw Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 223,701,792 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Australians and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.759 and weighted average of 7.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,601,652 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.000 and weighted average of 10.8%, a difference of 38.7%.
Family Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Australian | Chickasaw |
Minimum | 2.4% | 3.7% |
Maximum | 73.3% | 33.3% |
Range | 70.9% | 29.7% |
Mean | 10.0% | 12.7% |
Median | 7.3% | 12.0% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.9% | 9.8% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 11.3% | 14.5% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.5% | 4.7% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 10.4% | 5.3% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 10.3% | 5.2% |
Similar Demographics by Family Poverty
Demographics Similar to Australians by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Australians are Immigrants from Belgium (7.8%, a difference of 0.010%), Northern European (7.8%, a difference of 0.030%), Dutch (7.8%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Canada (7.8%, a difference of 0.060%), and Cambodian (7.8%, a difference of 0.070%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
Immigrants | Netherlands | 98.6 /100 | #61 | Exceptional 7.7% |
Macedonians | 98.6 /100 | #62 | Exceptional 7.8% |
Zimbabweans | 98.4 /100 | #63 | Exceptional 7.8% |
Koreans | 98.3 /100 | #64 | Exceptional 7.8% |
Immigrants | Bulgaria | 98.3 /100 | #65 | Exceptional 7.8% |
Dutch | 98.3 /100 | #66 | Exceptional 7.8% |
Northern Europeans | 98.3 /100 | #67 | Exceptional 7.8% |
Australians | 98.2 /100 | #68 | Exceptional 7.8% |
Immigrants | Belgium | 98.2 /100 | #69 | Exceptional 7.8% |
Immigrants | Canada | 98.2 /100 | #70 | Exceptional 7.8% |
Cambodians | 98.2 /100 | #71 | Exceptional 7.8% |
Immigrants | Romania | 98.2 /100 | #72 | Exceptional 7.8% |
Austrians | 98.2 /100 | #73 | Exceptional 7.8% |
Immigrants | China | 98.1 /100 | #74 | Exceptional 7.8% |
Immigrants | Croatia | 98.1 /100 | #75 | Exceptional 7.8% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Immigrants from Ghana (10.8%, a difference of 0.040%), Subsaharan African (10.9%, a difference of 0.070%), Mexican American Indian (10.9%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Liberia (10.8%, a difference of 0.26%), and Bangladeshi (10.9%, a difference of 0.46%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
Cubans | 0.4 /100 | #249 | Tragic 10.6% |
Salvadorans | 0.3 /100 | #250 | Tragic 10.7% |
Iroquois | 0.3 /100 | #251 | Tragic 10.7% |
Immigrants | Zaire | 0.3 /100 | #252 | Tragic 10.7% |
Immigrants | Western Africa | 0.3 /100 | #253 | Tragic 10.7% |
Ecuadorians | 0.2 /100 | #254 | Tragic 10.8% |
Immigrants | Liberia | 0.2 /100 | #255 | Tragic 10.8% |
Chickasaw | 0.2 /100 | #256 | Tragic 10.8% |
Immigrants | Ghana | 0.2 /100 | #257 | Tragic 10.8% |
Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.2 /100 | #258 | Tragic 10.9% |
Mexican American Indians | 0.2 /100 | #259 | Tragic 10.9% |
Bangladeshis | 0.2 /100 | #260 | Tragic 10.9% |
Shoshone | 0.2 /100 | #261 | Tragic 10.9% |
Spanish American Indians | 0.2 /100 | #262 | Tragic 10.9% |
Cape Verdeans | 0.1 /100 | #263 | Tragic 10.9% |