Chinese vs Immigrants from Congo Married-Couple Family Poverty
COMPARE
Chinese
Immigrants from Congo
Married-Couple Family Poverty
Married-Couple Family Poverty Comparison
Chinese
Immigrants from Congo
3.6%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
2nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
6.1%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
0.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
264th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Chinese vs Immigrants from Congo Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 64,670,469 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Chinese and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.040 and weighted average of 3.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 91,968,062 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Congo and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.407 and weighted average of 6.1%, a difference of 68.4%.

Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Chinese | Immigrants from Congo |
| Minimum | 0.44% | 1.1% |
| Maximum | 17.1% | 21.1% |
| Range | 16.7% | 20.0% |
| Mean | 4.2% | 6.8% |
| Median | 3.3% | 6.0% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.2% | 4.3% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 4.1% | 7.7% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.9% | 3.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.4% | 4.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.4% | 4.1% |
Similar Demographics by Married-Couple Family Poverty
Demographics Similar to Chinese by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chinese are Immigrants from India (3.6%, a difference of 0.18%), Norwegian (3.7%, a difference of 1.9%), Slovene (3.8%, a difference of 5.6%), Swedish (3.9%, a difference of 5.7%), and Luxembourger (3.9%, a difference of 6.4%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
| Immigrants | India | 100.0 /100 | #1 | Exceptional 3.6% |
| Chinese | 100.0 /100 | #2 | Exceptional 3.6% |
| Norwegians | 100.0 /100 | #3 | Exceptional 3.7% |
| Slovenes | 100.0 /100 | #4 | Exceptional 3.8% |
| Swedes | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 3.9% |
| Luxembourgers | 100.0 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 3.9% |
| Latvians | 100.0 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 3.9% |
| Thais | 100.0 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 3.9% |
| Croatians | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 3.9% |
| Carpatho Rusyns | 100.0 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 3.9% |
| Lithuanians | 100.0 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 4.0% |
| Bulgarians | 100.0 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 4.0% |
| Czechs | 100.0 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 4.0% |
| Slovaks | 100.0 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 4.0% |
| Poles | 100.0 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 4.0% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Congo by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Congo are Immigrants from Senegal (6.1%, a difference of 0.22%), Blackfeet (6.2%, a difference of 0.43%), Creek (6.2%, a difference of 0.51%), Spanish American (6.2%, a difference of 0.56%), and Shoshone (6.1%, a difference of 0.62%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
| Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 0.5 /100 | #257 | Tragic 6.0% |
| Immigrants | Immigrants | 0.5 /100 | #258 | Tragic 6.0% |
| Alaskan Athabascans | 0.4 /100 | #259 | Tragic 6.1% |
| Jamaicans | 0.3 /100 | #260 | Tragic 6.1% |
| Senegalese | 0.3 /100 | #261 | Tragic 6.1% |
| Shoshone | 0.3 /100 | #262 | Tragic 6.1% |
| Immigrants | Senegal | 0.3 /100 | #263 | Tragic 6.1% |
| Immigrants | Congo | 0.2 /100 | #264 | Tragic 6.1% |
| Blackfeet | 0.2 /100 | #265 | Tragic 6.2% |
| Creek | 0.2 /100 | #266 | Tragic 6.2% |
| Spanish Americans | 0.2 /100 | #267 | Tragic 6.2% |
| Alaska Natives | 0.2 /100 | #268 | Tragic 6.2% |
| Immigrants | West Indies | 0.1 /100 | #269 | Tragic 6.2% |
| Immigrants | Jamaica | 0.1 /100 | #270 | Tragic 6.2% |
| Immigrants | Bahamas | 0.1 /100 | #271 | Tragic 6.2% |