Zip Codes with the Lowest Poverty Level Among Single Females in Albuquerque, NM

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Lowest Poverty | Single Female
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlaskan AthabascanAmericanApacheArabArgentineanArmenianAustralianAustrianBasqueBelgianBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCubanCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDominicanDutchEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench CanadianGermanGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHonduranHopiHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)InupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMalaysianMalteseMexicanMexican American IndianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOsagePaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSerbianShoshoneSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishUgandanUkrainianUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYaquiYugoslavianYuman
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlaskan AthabascanAmericanApacheArabArgentineanArmenianAustralianAustrianBasqueBelgianBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCubanCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDominicanDutchEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench CanadianGermanGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHonduranHopiHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)InupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMalaysianMalteseMexicanMexican American IndianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOsagePaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSerbianShoshoneSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishUgandanUkrainianUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYaquiYugoslavianYuman
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBangladeshBelgiumBoliviaBrazilBulgariaCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEthiopiaEuropeFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGuatemalaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaLaosLatin AmericaLebanonLiberiaMalaysiaMexicoMiddle AfricaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSerbiaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBangladeshBelgiumBoliviaBrazilBulgariaCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEthiopiaEuropeFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGuatemalaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaLaosLatin AmericaLebanonLiberiaMalaysiaMexicoMiddle AfricaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSerbiaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
Albuquerque
Compare Zip Codes
Comparison Subject

Map of Zip Codes with the Lowest Poverty Level Among Single Females in Albuquerque

47.2%
8.8%
Zip Codes with the Lowest Poverty Level Among Single Females in Albuquerque Map

Zip Codes with the Lowest Poverty Level Among Single Females in Albuquerque, NM

Zip Code Single Female Poverty vs State vs National
1. 87122 8.8% 29.3% (-20.4)#12 24.1% (-15.2)#2,785
2. 87110 12.6% 29.3% (-16.6)#19 24.1% (-11.4)#4,893
3. 87112 13.8% 29.3% (-15.5)#22 24.1% (-10.3)#5,563
4. 87111 15.5% 29.3% (-13.8)#28 24.1% (-8.55)#6,596
5. 87113 15.6% 29.3% (-13.7)#29 24.1% (-8.51)#6,609
6. 87109 18.7% 29.3% (-10.6)#36 24.1% (-5.38)#8,455
7. 87123 22.9% 29.3% (-6.41)#53 24.1% (-1.19)#10,802
8. 87104 23.1% 29.3% (-6.18)#55 24.1% (-0.961)#10,957
9. 87120 23.4% 29.3% (-5.87)#56 24.1% (-0.650)#11,133
10. 87114 25.6% 29.3% (-3.65)#64 24.1% (+1.57)#12,379
11. 87105 26.4% 29.3% (-2.94)#67 24.1% (+2.28)#12,757
12. 87121 27.8% 29.3% (-1.50)#76 24.1% (+3.72)#13,513
13. 87107 28.0% 29.3% (-1.28)#78 24.1% (+3.94)#13,619
14. 87106 37.3% 29.3% (+8.01)#109 24.1% (+13.2)#17,514
15. 87108 37.6% 29.3% (+8.31)#110 24.1% (+13.5)#17,662
16. 87116 38.7% 29.3% (+9.36)#114 24.1% (+14.6)#17,941
17. 87102 47.2% 29.3% (+17.9)#140 24.1% (+23.1)#20,141

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Zip Codes with the Lowest Poverty Level Among Single Females in Albuquerque, NM?
Top 10 Zip Codes with the Lowest Poverty Level Among Single Females in Albuquerque, NM are:
#1
8.8%
#2
12.6%
#3
13.8%
#4
15.5%
#5
15.6%
#6
18.7%
#7
22.9%
#8
23.1%
#9
23.4%
#10
25.6%
What zip code has the Lowest Poverty Level Among Single Females in Albuquerque, NM?
87122 has the Lowest Poverty Level Among Single Females in Albuquerque, NM with 8.8%.
What is the Poverty Level Among Single Females in Albuquerque, NM?
Poverty Level Among Single Females in Albuquerque is 23.2%.
What is the Poverty Level Among Single Females in New Mexico?
Poverty Level Among Single Females in New Mexico is 29.3%.
What is the Poverty Level Among Single Females in the United States?
Poverty Level Among Single Females in the United States is 24.1%.