Zip Codes with the Lowest Percentage of Renter-Occupied Units in Albuquerque, NM

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Lowest Renter-Occupied
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlaskan AthabascanAmericanApacheArabArgentineanArmenianAustralianAustrianBasqueBelgianBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCubanCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDominicanDutchEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench CanadianGermanGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHonduranHopiHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)InupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMalaysianMalteseMexicanMexican American IndianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOsagePaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSerbianShoshoneSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishUgandanUkrainianUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYaquiYugoslavianYuman
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlaskan AthabascanAmericanApacheArabArgentineanArmenianAustralianAustrianBasqueBelgianBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCubanCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDominicanDutchEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench CanadianGermanGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHonduranHopiHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)InupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMalaysianMalteseMexicanMexican American IndianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOsagePaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSerbianShoshoneSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishUgandanUkrainianUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYaquiYugoslavianYuman
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBangladeshBelgiumBoliviaBrazilBulgariaCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEthiopiaEuropeFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGuatemalaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaLaosLatin AmericaLebanonLiberiaMalaysiaMexicoMiddle AfricaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSerbiaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBangladeshBelgiumBoliviaBrazilBulgariaCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEthiopiaEuropeFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGuatemalaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaLaosLatin AmericaLebanonLiberiaMalaysiaMexicoMiddle AfricaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSerbiaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
Albuquerque
Compare Zip Codes
Comparison Subject

Map of Zip Codes with the Lowest Percentage of Renter-Occupied Units in Albuquerque

97.1%
8.1%
Zip Codes with the Lowest Percentage of Renter-Occupied Units in Albuquerque Map

Zip Codes with the Lowest Percentage of Renter-Occupied Units in Albuquerque, NM

Zip Code % Renter-Occupied vs State vs National
1. 87122 8.1% 31.3% (-23.2)#30 35.2% (-27.1)#2,534
2. 87120 21.0% 31.3% (-10.3)#128 35.2% (-14.2)#13,852
3. 87121 24.9% 31.3% (-6.41)#151 35.2% (-10.3)#17,378
4. 87113 26.2% 31.3% (-5.12)#159 35.2% (-8.97)#18,447
5. 87105 27.4% 31.3% (-3.97)#162 35.2% (-7.82)#19,260
6. 87114 31.8% 31.3% (+0.426)#186 35.2% (-3.43)#22,120
7. 87104 35.5% 31.3% (+4.12)#209 35.2% (+0.270)#23,961
8. 87123 35.5% 31.3% (+4.18)#210 35.2% (+0.328)#23,992
9. 87107 37.8% 31.3% (+6.49)#227 35.2% (+2.64)#24,943
10. 87111 38.6% 31.3% (+7.23)#229 35.2% (+3.37)#25,217
11. 87112 39.2% 31.3% (+7.86)#232 35.2% (+4.01)#25,447
12. 87110 40.3% 31.3% (+9.00)#237 35.2% (+5.14)#25,793
13. 87109 49.9% 31.3% (+18.6)#255 35.2% (+14.7)#27,990
14. 87106 58.5% 31.3% (+27.2)#266 35.2% (+23.3)#29,165
15. 87108 64.5% 31.3% (+33.2)#268 35.2% (+29.3)#29,690
16. 87102 64.7% 31.3% (+33.4)#270 35.2% (+29.5)#29,707
17. 87116 97.1% 31.3% (+65.7)#273 35.2% (+61.9)#30,748

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Zip Codes with the Lowest Percentage of Renter-Occupied Units in Albuquerque, NM?
Top 10 Zip Codes with the Lowest Percentage of Renter-Occupied Units in Albuquerque, NM are:
#1
8.1%
#2
21.0%
#3
24.9%
#4
26.2%
#5
27.4%
#6
31.8%
#7
35.5%
#8
35.5%
#9
37.8%
#10
38.6%
What zip code has the Lowest Percentage of Renter-Occupied Units in Albuquerque, NM?
87122 has the Lowest Percentage of Renter-Occupied Units in Albuquerque, NM with 8.1%.
What is the Percentage of Renter-Occupied Units in Albuquerque, NM?
Percentage of Renter-Occupied Units in Albuquerque is 39.3%.
What is the Percentage of Renter-Occupied Units in New Mexico?
Percentage of Renter-Occupied Units in New Mexico is 31.3%.
What is the Percentage of Renter-Occupied Units in the United States?
Percentage of Renter-Occupied Units in the United States is 35.2%.