Pima Single Mother Poverty
COMPARE
Pima
Select to Compare
Single Mother Poverty
Pima Single Mother Poverty
38.6%
POVERTY | SINGLE MOTHERS
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
338th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Pima Single Mother Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 61,247,858 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Pima and poverty level among single mothers in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.395 and weighted average of 38.6%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Pima within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.25% in poverty level among single mothers.
It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Pima and poverty level among single mothers does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Pima influences an upward or downward trend in the level of poverty level among single mothers within an area, or if Pima simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of poverty level among single mothers due to other factors.
Demographics Similar to Pima by Single Mother Poverty
In terms of single mother poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Pima are Crow (38.6%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Yemen (38.5%, a difference of 0.21%), Cheyenne (38.5%, a difference of 0.25%), Sioux (38.8%, a difference of 0.49%), and Colville (39.3%, a difference of 1.8%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Mother Poverty |
Creek | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 36.7% |
Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 36.8% |
Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 37.1% |
Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 37.2% |
Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 37.8% |
Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 38.5% |
Immigrants from Yemen | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 38.5% |
Pima | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 38.6% |
Crow | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 38.6% |
Sioux | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 38.8% |
Colville | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 39.3% |
Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 40.2% |
Cajuns | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 40.3% |
Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 43.0% |
Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 43.2% |
Pima Single Mother Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Pima Data | Single Mother Poverty Data |
Minimum | 0.038% | 18.5% |
Maximum | 90.9% | 100.0% |
Range | 90.9% | 81.5% |
Mean | 33.3% | 50.6% |
Median | 7.0% | 51.0% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 3.0% | 33.1% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 77.4% | 60.6% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 74.4% | 27.5% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 37.0% | 23.7% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 36.2% | 23.3% |
Correlation Details
Pima Percentile | Sample Size | Single Mother Poverty |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.038% | 60,307,203 | 32.1% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.71% | 492,405 | 35.6% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.10% | 217,136 | 36.6% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.66% | 66,702 | 18.6% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.22% | 52,609 | 32.8% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.76% | 5,078 | 61.5% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.19% | 5,800 | 52.5% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.77% | 3,426 | 51.0% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.15% | 5,836 | 52.1% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.99% | 51,096 | 21.5% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.35% | 505 | 74.3% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.94% | 1,178 | 33.3% |
[ 7.0% - 7.5% ] 7.01% | 1,370 | 18.5% |
[ 11.0% - 11.5% ] 11.29% | 17,659 | 55.6% |
[ 12.5% - 13.0% ] 12.92% | 387 | 82.6% |
[ 48.0% - 48.5% ] 48.39% | 965 | 38.0% |
[ 65.5% - 66.0% ] 65.79% | 114 | 100.0% |
[ 71.0% - 71.5% ] 71.13% | 478 | 50.9% |
[ 75.5% - 76.0% ] 75.80% | 1,835 | 57.9% |
[ 78.5% - 79.0% ] 78.99% | 2,713 | 54.8% |
[ 79.0% - 79.5% ] 79.26% | 4,538 | 36.2% |
[ 83.0% - 83.5% ] 83.14% | 4,139 | 22.5% |
[ 85.5% - 86.0% ] 85.85% | 615 | 100.0% |
[ 86.5% - 87.0% ] 86.98% | 3,265 | 86.9% |
[ 90.5% - 91.0% ] 90.94% | 806 | 59.7% |