Pima In Labor Force | Age 35-44
COMPARE
Pima
Select to Compare
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Pima In Labor Force | Age 35-44
74.8%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE 35-44
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
344th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Pima In Labor Force | Age 35-44 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 61,535,254 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Pima and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 35 and 44 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.046 and weighted average of 74.8%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Pima within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.029% in labor force participation rate among population between the ages 35 and 44.
It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Pima and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 35 and 44 does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Pima influences an upward or downward trend in the level of labor force participation rate among population between the ages 35 and 44 within an area, or if Pima simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of labor force participation rate among population between the ages 35 and 44 due to other factors.
Demographics Similar to Pima by In Labor Force | Age 35-44
In terms of in labor force | age 35-44, the demographic groups most similar to Pima are Yuman (74.7%, a difference of 0.13%), Tohono O'odham (74.1%, a difference of 0.96%), Navajo (73.8%, a difference of 1.3%), Immigrants from Yemen (76.3%, a difference of 1.9%), and Crow (76.5%, a difference of 2.2%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | In Labor Force | Age 35-44 |
Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 79.2% |
Yakama | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 79.0% |
Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 78.9% |
Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 78.1% |
Apache | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 77.9% |
Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 77.4% |
Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 77.3% |
Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 77.0% |
Hopi | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 77.0% |
Crow | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 76.5% |
Immigrants from Yemen | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 76.3% |
Pima | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 74.8% |
Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 74.7% |
Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #346 | Tragic 74.1% |
Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #347 | Tragic 73.8% |
Pima In Labor Force | Age 35-44 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Pima Data | In Labor Force | Age 35-44 Data |
Minimum | 0.038% | 9.3% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% |
Range | 100.0% | 90.7% |
Mean | 35.6% | 73.8% |
Median | 11.8% | 78.3% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.0% | 65.4% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 74.8% | 83.7% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 70.8% | 18.4% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 36.6% | 22.7% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 36.0% | 22.3% |
Correlation Details
Pima Percentile | Sample Size | In Labor Force | Age 35-44 |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.038% | 60,538,176 | 82.9% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.71% | 537,568 | 74.5% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.10% | 221,882 | 81.0% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.66% | 66,702 | 80.4% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.23% | 53,054 | 80.2% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.76% | 5,078 | 77.7% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.20% | 7,278 | 77.5% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.77% | 3,426 | 68.1% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.15% | 5,836 | 61.0% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.99% | 51,096 | 82.7% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.32% | 1,371 | 77.1% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.92% | 2,027 | 74.8% |
[ 7.0% - 7.5% ] 7.01% | 1,370 | 78.9% |
[ 9.5% - 10.0% ] 9.57% | 115 | 38.9% |
[ 10.5% - 11.0% ] 10.78% | 102 | 100.0% |
[ 11.0% - 11.5% ] 11.29% | 17,659 | 82.2% |
[ 12.0% - 12.5% ] 12.28% | 1,270 | 75.3% |
[ 12.5% - 13.0% ] 12.92% | 387 | 64.2% |
[ 30.0% - 30.5% ] 30.03% | 383 | 84.6% |
[ 48.0% - 48.5% ] 48.39% | 965 | 13.0% |
[ 65.5% - 66.0% ] 65.79% | 114 | 100.0% |
[ 68.5% - 69.0% ] 68.98% | 332 | 100.0% |
[ 71.0% - 71.5% ] 71.13% | 478 | 63.8% |
[ 73.5% - 74.0% ] 73.77% | 385 | 100.0% |
[ 75.5% - 76.0% ] 75.80% | 1,835 | 82.6% |
[ 78.5% - 79.0% ] 78.99% | 2,713 | 9.3% |
[ 79.0% - 79.5% ] 79.26% | 4,538 | 39.9% |
[ 83.0% - 83.5% ] 83.14% | 4,139 | 87.9% |
[ 84.5% - 85.0% ] 84.86% | 733 | 100.0% |
[ 86.5% - 87.0% ] 86.98% | 3,265 | 66.6% |
[ 90.5% - 91.0% ] 90.94% | 806 | 55.5% |
[ 99.5% - 100.0% ] 100.00% | 171 | 100.0% |