Hungarian Female Poverty Among 18-24 Year Olds
COMPARE
Hungarian
Select to Compare
Female Poverty Among 18-24 Year Olds
Hungarian Female Poverty Among 18-24 Year Olds
19.8%
POVERTY | FEMALES 18-24
76.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
155th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Hungarian Female Poverty Among 18-24 Year Olds Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 465,185,254 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Hungarians and poverty level among females between the ages 18 and 24 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.663 and weighted average of 19.8%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Hungarians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 1.1% in poverty level among females between the ages 18 and 24.
It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Hungarians and poverty level among females between the ages 18 and 24 does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Hungarians influences an upward or downward trend in the level of poverty level among females between the ages 18 and 24 within an area, or if Hungarians simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of poverty level among females between the ages 18 and 24 due to other factors.
Demographics Similar to Hungarians by Female Poverty Among 18-24 Year Olds
In terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds, the demographic groups most similar to Hungarians are Immigrants from Zimbabwe (19.8%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Belgium (19.8%, a difference of 0.010%), Danish (19.8%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Lebanon (19.8%, a difference of 0.090%), and Immigrants from Japan (19.8%, a difference of 0.11%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty Among 18-24 Year Olds |
| Immigrants from Latin America | 81.3 /100 | #148 | Excellent 19.7% |
| Immigrants from Oceania | 81.2 /100 | #149 | Excellent 19.7% |
| Syrians | 80.2 /100 | #150 | Excellent 19.8% |
| Immigrants from Eastern Asia | 79.7 /100 | #151 | Good 19.8% |
| Yugoslavians | 79.0 /100 | #152 | Good 19.8% |
| Immigrants from Japan | 78.1 /100 | #153 | Good 19.8% |
| Immigrants from Zimbabwe | 76.7 /100 | #154 | Good 19.8% |
| Hungarians | 76.6 /100 | #155 | Good 19.8% |
| Immigrants from Belgium | 76.4 /100 | #156 | Good 19.8% |
| Danes | 75.5 /100 | #157 | Good 19.8% |
| Immigrants from Lebanon | 75.3 /100 | #158 | Good 19.8% |
| Trinidadians and Tobagonians | 74.4 /100 | #159 | Good 19.8% |
| Pakistanis | 74.1 /100 | #160 | Good 19.8% |
| Immigrants from Belize | 74.1 /100 | #161 | Good 19.8% |
| French Canadians | 73.0 /100 | #162 | Good 19.9% |
Hungarian Female Poverty Among 18-24 Year Olds Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Hungarian Data | Female Poverty Among 18-24 Year Olds Data |
| Minimum | 0.21% | 0.77% |
| Maximum | 41.1% | 81.0% |
| Range | 40.8% | 80.3% |
| Mean | 13.1% | 27.4% |
| Median | 9.5% | 20.1% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.8% | 17.1% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 19.4% | 33.7% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 14.7% | 16.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 11.5% | 19.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 11.3% | 18.9% |
Correlation Details
| Hungarian Percentile | Sample Size | Female Poverty Among 18-24 Year Olds |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.21% | 347,362,724 | 20.8% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.68% | 80,734,101 | 18.9% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.20% | 19,349,300 | 18.1% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.73% | 7,478,520 | 17.2% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.23% | 3,395,082 | 18.7% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.74% | 1,822,520 | 18.3% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.25% | 1,607,625 | 17.8% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.77% | 1,180,153 | 17.1% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.24% | 720,113 | 16.7% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.76% | 310,539 | 14.7% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.28% | 381,543 | 22.7% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.80% | 111,106 | 18.9% |
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.24% | 105,435 | 25.8% |
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.79% | 99,762 | 18.4% |
[ 7.0% - 7.5% ] 7.19% | 55,706 | 14.7% |
[ 7.5% - 8.0% ] 7.74% | 54,706 | 16.6% |
[ 8.0% - 8.5% ] 8.21% | 33,852 | 10.4% |
[ 8.5% - 9.0% ] 8.55% | 7,872 | 25.2% |
[ 9.0% - 9.5% ] 9.32% | 3,305 | 19.4% |
[ 9.5% - 10.0% ] 9.75% | 1,190 | 40.9% |
[ 10.0% - 10.5% ] 10.44% | 2,597 | 8.4% |
[ 10.5% - 11.0% ] 10.97% | 50,540 | 51.5% |
[ 11.0% - 11.5% ] 11.30% | 24,194 | 4.0% |
[ 11.5% - 12.0% ] 11.67% | 8,732 | 0.77% |
[ 12.0% - 12.5% ] 12.05% | 74,159 | 23.1% |
[ 14.5% - 15.0% ] 14.81% | 54 | 75.0% |
[ 15.0% - 15.5% ] 15.05% | 6,773 | 0.99% |
[ 17.0% - 17.5% ] 17.14% | 47,509 | 30.0% |
[ 19.0% - 19.5% ] 19.42% | 1,792 | 28.6% |
[ 21.0% - 21.5% ] 21.35% | 28,287 | 38.8% |
[ 22.5% - 23.0% ] 22.53% | 7,385 | 41.8% |
[ 24.5% - 25.0% ] 24.64% | 63,011 | 30.3% |
[ 25.0% - 25.5% ] 25.30% | 5,501 | 33.7% |
[ 29.5% - 30.0% ] 29.88% | 800 | 31.0% |
[ 31.5% - 32.0% ] 31.96% | 3,858 | 75.2% |
[ 38.5% - 39.0% ] 38.95% | 9,578 | 53.9% |
[ 40.5% - 41.0% ] 40.81% | 34,368 | 41.7% |
[ 41.0% - 41.5% ] 41.06% | 962 | 81.0% |