Hungarian Child Poverty Under the Age of 16
COMPARE
Hungarian
Select to Compare
Child Poverty Under the Age of 16
Hungarian Child Poverty Under the Age of 16
16.2%
POVERTY | CHILDREN < 16
52.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
171st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Hungarian Child Poverty Under the Age of 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 478,420,281 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Hungarians and poverty level among children under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.716 and weighted average of 16.2%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Hungarians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 1.4% in poverty level among children under the age of 16.
It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Hungarians and poverty level among children under the age of 16 does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Hungarians influences an upward or downward trend in the level of poverty level among children under the age of 16 within an area, or if Hungarians simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of poverty level among children under the age of 16 due to other factors.
Demographics Similar to Hungarians by Child Poverty Under the Age of 16
In terms of child poverty under the age of 16, the demographic groups most similar to Hungarians are Afghan (16.2%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Saudi Arabia (16.2%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Colombia (16.1%, a difference of 0.23%), Uruguayan (16.1%, a difference of 0.27%), and White/Caucasian (16.2%, a difference of 0.30%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Under the Age of 16 |
| Immigrants from Germany | 67.3 /100 | #164 | Good 15.8% |
| Guamanians/Chamorros | 66.4 /100 | #165 | Good 15.9% |
| Immigrants from Oceania | 65.4 /100 | #166 | Good 15.9% |
| Costa Ricans | 61.1 /100 | #167 | Good 16.0% |
| South Americans | 57.9 /100 | #168 | Average 16.0% |
| Uruguayans | 54.7 /100 | #169 | Average 16.1% |
| Immigrants from Colombia | 54.4 /100 | #170 | Average 16.1% |
| Hungarians | 52.5 /100 | #171 | Average 16.2% |
| Afghans | 52.3 /100 | #172 | Average 16.2% |
| Immigrants from Saudi Arabia | 52.1 /100 | #173 | Average 16.2% |
| Whites/Caucasians | 50.0 /100 | #174 | Average 16.2% |
| Scotch-Irish | 47.1 /100 | #175 | Average 16.3% |
| Lebanese | 45.9 /100 | #176 | Average 16.3% |
| Ethiopians | 43.4 /100 | #177 | Average 16.3% |
| Immigrants from Ethiopia | 42.3 /100 | #178 | Average 16.4% |
Hungarian Child Poverty Under the Age of 16 Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Hungarian Data | Child Poverty Under the Age of 16 Data |
| Minimum | 0.21% | 0.42% |
| Maximum | 53.8% | 100.0% |
| Range | 53.5% | 99.6% |
| Mean | 15.2% | 32.6% |
| Median | 11.3% | 25.0% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.5% | 13.3% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 21.9% | 46.1% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 16.4% | 32.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 13.3% | 25.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 13.2% | 25.4% |
Correlation Details
| Hungarian Percentile | Sample Size | Child Poverty Under the Age of 16 |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.21% | 354,079,503 | 17.4% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.68% | 83,782,483 | 13.4% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.20% | 20,856,892 | 12.9% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.73% | 8,279,654 | 13.7% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.23% | 3,841,097 | 13.2% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.75% | 2,050,090 | 14.0% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.25% | 1,688,452 | 16.3% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.77% | 1,241,687 | 17.1% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.25% | 847,342 | 15.6% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.74% | 426,584 | 10.0% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.28% | 415,791 | 25.8% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.78% | 109,531 | 16.7% |
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.22% | 138,512 | 25.9% |
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.78% | 98,511 | 11.1% |
[ 7.0% - 7.5% ] 7.14% | 58,318 | 10.7% |
[ 7.5% - 8.0% ] 7.75% | 62,248 | 25.8% |
[ 8.0% - 8.5% ] 8.22% | 35,093 | 7.0% |
[ 8.5% - 9.0% ] 8.68% | 15,254 | 30.2% |
[ 9.0% - 9.5% ] 9.18% | 7,938 | 41.9% |
[ 9.5% - 10.0% ] 9.75% | 5,263 | 19.4% |
[ 10.0% - 10.5% ] 10.37% | 3,470 | 23.9% |
[ 10.5% - 11.0% ] 10.95% | 53,356 | 42.0% |
[ 11.0% - 11.5% ] 11.30% | 24,194 | 4.9% |
[ 11.5% - 12.0% ] 11.76% | 17,972 | 2.1% |
[ 12.0% - 12.5% ] 12.05% | 75,143 | 37.3% |
[ 12.5% - 13.0% ] 12.71% | 299 | 38.9% |
[ 13.0% - 13.5% ] 13.20% | 568 | 13.5% |
[ 14.0% - 14.5% ] 14.04% | 178 | 12.5% |
[ 15.0% - 15.5% ] 15.12% | 172 | 25.0% |
[ 15.5% - 16.0% ] 15.85% | 164 | 100.0% |
[ 17.0% - 17.5% ] 17.14% | 48,083 | 46.6% |
[ 17.5% - 18.0% ] 17.96% | 802 | 0.42% |
[ 19.0% - 19.5% ] 19.42% | 1,792 | 9.4% |
[ 21.0% - 21.5% ] 21.35% | 28,287 | 54.1% |
[ 22.5% - 23.0% ] 22.53% | 7,385 | 31.0% |
[ 24.5% - 25.0% ] 24.64% | 63,011 | 38.9% |
[ 25.0% - 25.5% ] 25.30% | 5,501 | 67.6% |
[ 26.0% - 26.5% ] 26.04% | 192 | 91.7% |
[ 26.5% - 27.0% ] 26.60% | 188 | 69.6% |
[ 31.5% - 32.0% ] 31.96% | 3,858 | 61.1% |
[ 38.5% - 39.0% ] 38.95% | 9,578 | 70.0% |
[ 40.5% - 41.0% ] 40.81% | 34,395 | 45.6% |
[ 41.0% - 41.5% ] 41.06% | 962 | 70.4% |
[ 50.5% - 51.0% ] 50.79% | 315 | 84.6% |
[ 53.5% - 54.0% ] 53.76% | 173 | 66.7% |