Hungarian Family Households with Children
COMPARE
Hungarian
Select to Compare
Family Households with Children
Hungarian Family Households with Children
27.6%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS WITH CHILDREN
74.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
156th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Hungarian Family Households with Children Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 485,629,585 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Hungarians and percentage of family households with children in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.542 and weighted average of 27.6%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Hungarians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.64% in percentage of family households with children.
It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Hungarians and percentage of family households with children does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Hungarians influences an upward or downward trend in the level of percentage of family households with children within an area, or if Hungarians simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of percentage of family households with children due to other factors.
Demographics Similar to Hungarians by Family Households with Children
In terms of family households with children, the demographic groups most similar to Hungarians are Comanche (27.6%, a difference of 0.010%), Icelander (27.6%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Cabo Verde (27.6%, a difference of 0.030%), Ethiopian (27.6%, a difference of 0.070%), and Indian (Asian) (27.6%, a difference of 0.080%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Households with Children |
| Menominee | 78.9 /100 | #149 | Good 27.6% |
| Argentineans | 78.5 /100 | #150 | Good 27.6% |
| Portuguese | 77.8 /100 | #151 | Good 27.6% |
| Ethiopians | 77.0 /100 | #152 | Good 27.6% |
| Immigrants from Cabo Verde | 75.6 /100 | #153 | Good 27.6% |
| Icelanders | 75.3 /100 | #154 | Good 27.6% |
| Comanche | 74.8 /100 | #155 | Good 27.6% |
| Hungarians | 74.6 /100 | #156 | Good 27.6% |
| Indians (Asian) | 71.6 /100 | #157 | Good 27.6% |
| Romanians | 70.8 /100 | #158 | Good 27.6% |
| Mongolians | 70.7 /100 | #159 | Good 27.6% |
| Sub-Saharan Africans | 67.5 /100 | #160 | Good 27.6% |
| Alaskan Athabascans | 67.1 /100 | #161 | Good 27.6% |
| Immigrants from Bangladesh | 67.0 /100 | #162 | Good 27.6% |
| Czechs | 65.3 /100 | #163 | Good 27.5% |
Hungarian Family Households with Children Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Hungarian Data | Family Households with Children Data |
| Minimum | 0.21% | 4.2% |
| Maximum | 84.3% | 100.0% |
| Range | 84.0% | 95.8% |
| Mean | 20.5% | 34.7% |
| Median | 16.1% | 26.5% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 7.7% | 23.3% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 28.4% | 40.4% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 20.6% | 17.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 17.9% | 21.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 17.8% | 21.0% |
Correlation Details
| Hungarian Percentile | Sample Size | Family Households with Children |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.21% | 357,042,476 | 28.2% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.68% | 85,688,856 | 25.7% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.20% | 21,772,625 | 25.2% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.73% | 8,687,030 | 25.7% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.23% | 4,093,382 | 26.1% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.75% | 2,274,429 | 26.7% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.25% | 1,843,183 | 25.8% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.77% | 1,313,639 | 25.5% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.26% | 908,078 | 25.9% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.74% | 459,971 | 25.4% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.28% | 442,844 | 24.0% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.78% | 155,238 | 25.4% |
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.22% | 150,003 | 23.4% |
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.77% | 120,186 | 27.3% |
[ 7.0% - 7.5% ] 7.18% | 83,930 | 27.5% |
[ 7.5% - 8.0% ] 7.75% | 70,916 | 33.5% |
[ 8.0% - 8.5% ] 8.21% | 48,062 | 22.5% |
[ 8.5% - 9.0% ] 8.71% | 28,224 | 25.7% |
[ 9.0% - 9.5% ] 9.14% | 18,212 | 20.6% |
[ 9.5% - 10.0% ] 9.72% | 13,377 | 21.8% |
[ 10.0% - 10.5% ] 10.32% | 6,408 | 25.0% |
[ 10.5% - 11.0% ] 10.95% | 55,384 | 28.1% |
[ 11.0% - 11.5% ] 11.30% | 26,068 | 26.3% |
[ 11.5% - 12.0% ] 11.76% | 18,859 | 32.5% |
[ 12.0% - 12.5% ] 12.06% | 77,181 | 51.3% |
[ 12.5% - 13.0% ] 12.67% | 2,722 | 16.8% |
[ 13.0% - 13.5% ] 13.32% | 2,717 | 22.8% |
[ 14.0% - 14.5% ] 14.18% | 402 | 26.2% |
[ 14.5% - 15.0% ] 14.72% | 795 | 20.0% |
[ 15.0% - 15.5% ] 15.05% | 7,051 | 33.8% |
[ 15.5% - 16.0% ] 15.85% | 164 | 22.7% |
[ 16.0% - 16.5% ] 16.42% | 67 | 42.3% |
[ 17.0% - 17.5% ] 17.14% | 49,883 | 53.3% |
[ 17.5% - 18.0% ] 17.94% | 853 | 40.4% |
[ 18.0% - 18.5% ] 18.13% | 1,302 | 9.3% |
[ 18.5% - 19.0% ] 18.80% | 947 | 20.0% |
[ 19.0% - 19.5% ] 19.42% | 1,921 | 40.4% |
[ 21.0% - 21.5% ] 21.35% | 28,287 | 75.1% |
[ 21.5% - 22.0% ] 21.60% | 1,102 | 10.1% |
[ 22.5% - 23.0% ] 22.53% | 7,385 | 38.4% |
[ 23.0% - 23.5% ] 23.21% | 224 | 66.7% |
[ 24.0% - 24.5% ] 24.00% | 125 | 39.0% |
[ 24.5% - 25.0% ] 24.63% | 64,313 | 54.3% |
[ 25.0% - 25.5% ] 25.29% | 6,460 | 69.5% |
[ 26.0% - 26.5% ] 26.04% | 864 | 14.4% |
[ 26.5% - 27.0% ] 26.60% | 188 | 4.2% |
[ 28.0% - 28.5% ] 28.39% | 236 | 11.5% |
[ 28.5% - 29.0% ] 28.69% | 610 | 19.1% |
[ 29.5% - 30.0% ] 29.82% | 959 | 44.7% |
[ 30.0% - 30.5% ] 30.23% | 258 | 28.3% |
[ 31.5% - 32.0% ] 31.96% | 3,858 | 29.3% |
[ 33.0% - 33.5% ] 33.30% | 871 | 23.3% |
[ 33.5% - 34.0% ] 33.83% | 133 | 58.1% |
[ 37.0% - 37.5% ] 37.50% | 48 | 33.3% |
[ 38.5% - 39.0% ] 38.95% | 9,614 | 84.8% |
[ 40.5% - 41.0% ] 40.81% | 34,395 | 82.6% |
[ 41.0% - 41.5% ] 41.12% | 1,481 | 40.6% |
[ 50.5% - 51.0% ] 50.79% | 315 | 63.0% |
[ 53.5% - 54.0% ] 53.76% | 173 | 4.3% |
[ 69.0% - 69.5% ] 69.48% | 154 | 30.8% |
[ 75.0% - 75.5% ] 75.00% | 20 | 100.0% |
[ 84.0% - 84.5% ] 84.25% | 127 | 100.0% |