Danish vs Norwegian Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Danish
Norwegian
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Danes
Norwegians
20.7%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
73.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
158th/ 347
METRIC RANK
20.8%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
63.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
166th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Danish vs Norwegian Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 461,634,769 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Danes and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.509 and weighted average of 20.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 516,441,916 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Norwegians and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.317 and weighted average of 20.8%, a difference of 0.73%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Danish | Norwegian |
| Minimum | 16.6% | 3.6% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 50.0% |
| Range | 83.4% | 46.4% |
| Mean | 35.4% | 24.8% |
| Median | 28.5% | 23.2% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 21.7% | 19.1% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 40.0% | 29.1% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 18.3% | 10.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 19.0% | 8.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 18.8% | 8.7% |
Demographics Similar to Danes and Norwegians by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Danes are Costa Rican (20.7%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Oceania (20.7%, a difference of 0.11%), Arab (20.7%, a difference of 0.17%), South American Indian (20.6%, a difference of 0.22%), and Samoan (20.6%, a difference of 0.26%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Norwegians are Immigrants from Norway (20.8%, a difference of 0.0%), Ugandan (20.8%, a difference of 0.060%), Iraqi (20.8%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Costa Rica (20.9%, a difference of 0.10%), and Lebanese (20.8%, a difference of 0.32%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| Immigrants | Uruguay | 77.7 /100 | #152 | Good 20.6% |
| Swedes | 77.1 /100 | #153 | Good 20.6% |
| Immigrants | Western Europe | 76.7 /100 | #154 | Good 20.6% |
| Samoans | 76.0 /100 | #155 | Good 20.6% |
| South American Indians | 75.7 /100 | #156 | Good 20.6% |
| Immigrants | Oceania | 74.3 /100 | #157 | Good 20.7% |
| Danes | 73.0 /100 | #158 | Good 20.7% |
| Costa Ricans | 71.8 /100 | #159 | Good 20.7% |
| Arabs | 70.8 /100 | #160 | Good 20.7% |
| Kenyans | 68.5 /100 | #161 | Good 20.8% |
| Northern Europeans | 68.4 /100 | #162 | Good 20.8% |
| Lebanese | 67.6 /100 | #163 | Good 20.8% |
| Iraqis | 64.5 /100 | #164 | Good 20.8% |
| Ugandans | 64.0 /100 | #165 | Good 20.8% |
| Norwegians | 63.0 /100 | #166 | Good 20.8% |
| Immigrants | Norway | 63.0 /100 | #167 | Good 20.8% |
| Immigrants | Costa Rica | 61.5 /100 | #168 | Good 20.9% |
| Immigrants | Trinidad and Tobago | 56.3 /100 | #169 | Average 20.9% |
| New Zealanders | 53.2 /100 | #170 | Average 21.0% |
| Moroccans | 52.8 /100 | #171 | Average 21.0% |
| Guyanese | 52.0 /100 | #172 | Average 21.0% |