Danish vs Czech Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Danish
Czech
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Danes
Czechs
20.7%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
73.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
158th/ 347
METRIC RANK
21.0%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
46.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
175th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Danish vs Czech Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 461,634,769 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Danes and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.509 and weighted average of 20.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 472,282,128 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Czechs and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.264 and weighted average of 21.0%, a difference of 1.8%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Danish | Czech |
Minimum | 16.6% | 6.8% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 80.9% |
Range | 83.4% | 74.1% |
Mean | 35.4% | 29.6% |
Median | 28.5% | 25.3% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 21.7% | 20.5% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 40.0% | 36.2% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 18.3% | 15.7% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 19.0% | 14.3% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 18.8% | 14.3% |
Demographics Similar to Danes and Czechs by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Danes are Costa Rican (20.7%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Oceania (20.7%, a difference of 0.11%), Arab (20.7%, a difference of 0.17%), South American Indian (20.6%, a difference of 0.22%), and Kenyan (20.8%, a difference of 0.34%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Czechs are Canadian (21.1%, a difference of 0.080%), Cuban (21.0%, a difference of 0.20%), Immigrants from Guyana (21.0%, a difference of 0.24%), Guyanese (21.0%, a difference of 0.33%), and Moroccan (21.0%, a difference of 0.37%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
South American Indians | 75.7 /100 | #156 | Good 20.6% |
Immigrants | Oceania | 74.3 /100 | #157 | Good 20.7% |
Danes | 73.0 /100 | #158 | Good 20.7% |
Costa Ricans | 71.8 /100 | #159 | Good 20.7% |
Arabs | 70.8 /100 | #160 | Good 20.7% |
Kenyans | 68.5 /100 | #161 | Good 20.8% |
Northern Europeans | 68.4 /100 | #162 | Good 20.8% |
Lebanese | 67.6 /100 | #163 | Good 20.8% |
Iraqis | 64.5 /100 | #164 | Good 20.8% |
Ugandans | 64.0 /100 | #165 | Good 20.8% |
Norwegians | 63.0 /100 | #166 | Good 20.8% |
Immigrants | Norway | 63.0 /100 | #167 | Good 20.8% |
Immigrants | Costa Rica | 61.5 /100 | #168 | Good 20.9% |
Immigrants | Trinidad and Tobago | 56.3 /100 | #169 | Average 20.9% |
New Zealanders | 53.2 /100 | #170 | Average 21.0% |
Moroccans | 52.8 /100 | #171 | Average 21.0% |
Guyanese | 52.0 /100 | #172 | Average 21.0% |
Immigrants | Guyana | 50.6 /100 | #173 | Average 21.0% |
Cubans | 50.0 /100 | #174 | Average 21.0% |
Czechs | 46.8 /100 | #175 | Average 21.0% |
Canadians | 45.4 /100 | #176 | Average 21.1% |