Danish vs South African Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Danish
South African
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Danes
South Africans
20.7%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
73.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
158th/ 347
METRIC RANK
20.4%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
85.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
147th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Danish vs South African Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 461,634,769 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Danes and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.509 and weighted average of 20.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 180,862,310 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of South Africans and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.525 and weighted average of 20.4%, a difference of 1.2%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Danish | South African |
| Minimum | 16.6% | 7.4% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| Range | 83.4% | 92.6% |
| Mean | 35.4% | 23.5% |
| Median | 28.5% | 20.4% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 21.7% | 15.2% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 40.0% | 23.6% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 18.3% | 8.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 19.0% | 18.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 18.8% | 18.4% |
Demographics Similar to Danes and South Africans by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Danes are Costa Rican (20.7%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Oceania (20.7%, a difference of 0.11%), Arab (20.7%, a difference of 0.17%), South American Indian (20.6%, a difference of 0.22%), and Samoan (20.6%, a difference of 0.26%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to South Africans are Venezuelan (20.4%, a difference of 0.030%), Luxembourger (20.4%, a difference of 0.050%), Austrian (20.4%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Uzbekistan (20.3%, a difference of 0.42%), and Australian (20.3%, a difference of 0.43%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| Immigrants | Uganda | 89.1 /100 | #142 | Excellent 20.3% |
| Australians | 88.4 /100 | #143 | Excellent 20.3% |
| Immigrants | Uzbekistan | 88.3 /100 | #144 | Excellent 20.3% |
| Austrians | 85.8 /100 | #145 | Excellent 20.4% |
| Venezuelans | 85.5 /100 | #146 | Excellent 20.4% |
| South Africans | 85.3 /100 | #147 | Excellent 20.4% |
| Luxembourgers | 84.9 /100 | #148 | Excellent 20.4% |
| Portuguese | 81.5 /100 | #149 | Excellent 20.5% |
| Immigrants | Denmark | 80.5 /100 | #150 | Excellent 20.5% |
| Puget Sound Salish | 79.6 /100 | #151 | Good 20.6% |
| Immigrants | Uruguay | 77.7 /100 | #152 | Good 20.6% |
| Swedes | 77.1 /100 | #153 | Good 20.6% |
| Immigrants | Western Europe | 76.7 /100 | #154 | Good 20.6% |
| Samoans | 76.0 /100 | #155 | Good 20.6% |
| South American Indians | 75.7 /100 | #156 | Good 20.6% |
| Immigrants | Oceania | 74.3 /100 | #157 | Good 20.7% |
| Danes | 73.0 /100 | #158 | Good 20.7% |
| Costa Ricans | 71.8 /100 | #159 | Good 20.7% |
| Arabs | 70.8 /100 | #160 | Good 20.7% |
| Kenyans | 68.5 /100 | #161 | Good 20.8% |
| Northern Europeans | 68.4 /100 | #162 | Good 20.8% |