Turkish vs Bermudan Married-Couple Family Poverty
COMPARE
Turkish
Bermudan
Married-Couple Family Poverty
Married-Couple Family Poverty Comparison
Turks
Bermudans
4.3%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
99.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
49th/ 347
METRIC RANK
5.2%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
52.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
171st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Turkish vs Bermudan Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 270,078,353 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Turks and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.361 and weighted average of 4.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 55,613,061 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Bermudans and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.202 and weighted average of 5.2%, a difference of 20.5%.
Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Turkish | Bermudan |
| Minimum | 0.78% | 0.39% |
| Maximum | 16.2% | 18.5% |
| Range | 15.5% | 18.1% |
| Mean | 4.6% | 5.3% |
| Median | 3.6% | 4.9% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.6% | 2.5% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 4.9% | 6.6% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.4% | 4.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.6% | 3.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.5% | 3.6% |
Similar Demographics by Married-Couple Family Poverty
Demographics Similar to Turks by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Turks are Australian (4.3%, a difference of 0.080%), Burmese (4.3%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Lithuania (4.3%, a difference of 0.11%), Russian (4.3%, a difference of 0.13%), and Immigrants from South Central Asia (4.3%, a difference of 0.15%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
| Scottish | 99.8 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| Swiss | 99.8 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| Immigrants | Japan | 99.8 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| Serbians | 99.8 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| British | 99.8 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| Immigrants | South Central Asia | 99.8 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| Australians | 99.7 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| Turks | 99.7 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| Burmese | 99.7 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.7 /100 | #51 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| Russians | 99.7 /100 | #52 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| Welsh | 99.7 /100 | #53 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| Austrians | 99.7 /100 | #54 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| French | 99.7 /100 | #55 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 99.7 /100 | #56 | Exceptional 4.3% |
Demographics Similar to Bermudans by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Bermudans are Immigrants from Argentina (5.2%, a difference of 0.18%), Immigrants from Northern Africa (5.2%, a difference of 0.18%), Ottawa (5.2%, a difference of 0.19%), Alsatian (5.2%, a difference of 0.20%), and Immigrants from Uganda (5.2%, a difference of 0.23%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
| Hawaiians | 62.3 /100 | #164 | Good 5.1% |
| Immigrants | Malaysia | 62.2 /100 | #165 | Good 5.1% |
| Paraguayans | 61.5 /100 | #166 | Good 5.1% |
| Costa Ricans | 61.5 /100 | #167 | Good 5.1% |
| Immigrants | Uganda | 54.9 /100 | #168 | Average 5.2% |
| Ottawa | 54.5 /100 | #169 | Average 5.2% |
| Immigrants | Argentina | 54.4 /100 | #170 | Average 5.2% |
| Bermudans | 52.9 /100 | #171 | Average 5.2% |
| Immigrants | Northern Africa | 51.3 /100 | #172 | Average 5.2% |
| Alsatians | 51.2 /100 | #173 | Average 5.2% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Africa | 50.0 /100 | #174 | Average 5.2% |
| Marshallese | 47.9 /100 | #175 | Average 5.2% |
| Menominee | 47.8 /100 | #176 | Average 5.2% |
| Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 45.1 /100 | #177 | Average 5.2% |
| Immigrants | Ukraine | 44.9 /100 | #178 | Average 5.2% |