Turkish vs Dominican Married-Couple Family Poverty
COMPARE
Turkish
Dominican
Married-Couple Family Poverty
Married-Couple Family Poverty Comparison
Turks
Dominicans
4.3%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
99.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
49th/ 347
METRIC RANK
8.3%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
332nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Turkish vs Dominican Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 270,078,353 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Turks and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.361 and weighted average of 4.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 351,701,155 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Dominicans and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.441 and weighted average of 8.3%, a difference of 92.4%.
Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Turkish | Dominican |
| Minimum | 0.78% | 2.9% |
| Maximum | 16.2% | 20.8% |
| Range | 15.5% | 17.9% |
| Mean | 4.6% | 9.6% |
| Median | 3.6% | 9.0% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.6% | 6.7% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 4.9% | 12.5% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.4% | 5.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.6% | 4.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.5% | 4.1% |
Similar Demographics by Married-Couple Family Poverty
Demographics Similar to Turks by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Turks are Australian (4.3%, a difference of 0.080%), Burmese (4.3%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Lithuania (4.3%, a difference of 0.11%), Russian (4.3%, a difference of 0.13%), and Immigrants from South Central Asia (4.3%, a difference of 0.15%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
| Scottish | 99.8 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| Swiss | 99.8 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| Immigrants | Japan | 99.8 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| Serbians | 99.8 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| British | 99.8 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| Immigrants | South Central Asia | 99.8 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| Australians | 99.7 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| Turks | 99.7 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| Burmese | 99.7 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.7 /100 | #51 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| Russians | 99.7 /100 | #52 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| Welsh | 99.7 /100 | #53 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| Austrians | 99.7 /100 | #54 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| French | 99.7 /100 | #55 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 99.7 /100 | #56 | Exceptional 4.3% |
Demographics Similar to Dominicans by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Dominicans are Central American Indian (8.3%, a difference of 0.060%), Paiute (8.3%, a difference of 0.12%), Lumbee (8.3%, a difference of 0.47%), Immigrants from Dominican Republic (8.4%, a difference of 1.1%), and Native/Alaskan (8.2%, a difference of 1.4%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
| Immigrants | Cuba | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 7.5% |
| Immigrants | Bangladesh | 0.0 /100 | #326 | Tragic 7.5% |
| Hispanics or Latinos | 0.0 /100 | #327 | Tragic 7.5% |
| Immigrants | Mexico | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 7.6% |
| Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 8.2% |
| Paiute | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 8.3% |
| Central American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 8.3% |
| Dominicans | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 8.3% |
| Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 8.3% |
| Immigrants | Dominican Republic | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 8.4% |
| Sioux | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 8.7% |
| Apache | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 9.0% |
| Yakama | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 9.0% |
| Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 9.4% |
| Crow | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 9.6% |