Scandinavian vs Chippewa Female Poverty
COMPARE
Scandinavian
Chippewa
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Scandinavians
Chippewa
12.1%
FEMALE POVERTY
98.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
58th/ 347
METRIC RANK
16.7%
FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
302nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Scandinavian vs Chippewa Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 472,075,178 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Scandinavians and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.611 and weighted average of 12.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 214,995,312 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Chippewa and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.544 and weighted average of 16.7%, a difference of 37.6%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Scandinavian | Chippewa |
Minimum | 3.9% | 7.0% |
Maximum | 75.0% | 78.4% |
Range | 71.1% | 71.4% |
Mean | 18.4% | 25.6% |
Median | 11.3% | 20.4% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 10.0% | 15.3% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 18.0% | 31.2% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 7.9% | 15.8% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 16.4% | 15.1% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 16.2% | 15.0% |
Similar Demographics by Female Poverty
Demographics Similar to Scandinavians by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Scandinavians are Immigrants from Europe (12.1%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Serbia (12.1%, a difference of 0.080%), Estonian (12.1%, a difference of 0.14%), Immigrants from Australia (12.2%, a difference of 0.25%), and Immigrants from Asia (12.2%, a difference of 0.26%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
Immigrants | Bulgaria | 98.9 /100 | #51 | Exceptional 12.0% |
Immigrants | Croatia | 98.7 /100 | #52 | Exceptional 12.0% |
Immigrants | Austria | 98.7 /100 | #53 | Exceptional 12.0% |
Immigrants | Philippines | 98.7 /100 | #54 | Exceptional 12.1% |
Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 98.5 /100 | #55 | Exceptional 12.1% |
Estonians | 98.3 /100 | #56 | Exceptional 12.1% |
Immigrants | Serbia | 98.3 /100 | #57 | Exceptional 12.1% |
Scandinavians | 98.2 /100 | #58 | Exceptional 12.1% |
Immigrants | Europe | 98.2 /100 | #59 | Exceptional 12.1% |
Immigrants | Australia | 98.1 /100 | #60 | Exceptional 12.2% |
Immigrants | Asia | 98.1 /100 | #61 | Exceptional 12.2% |
Immigrants | Italy | 98.0 /100 | #62 | Exceptional 12.2% |
Ukrainians | 98.0 /100 | #63 | Exceptional 12.2% |
Germans | 98.0 /100 | #64 | Exceptional 12.2% |
Indians (Asian) | 97.9 /100 | #65 | Exceptional 12.2% |
Demographics Similar to Chippewa by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chippewa are Guatemalan (16.7%, a difference of 0.030%), Bahamian (16.6%, a difference of 0.36%), Hispanic or Latino (16.6%, a difference of 0.40%), Choctaw (16.8%, a difference of 0.61%), and Immigrants from Central America (16.8%, a difference of 0.67%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
Senegalese | 0.0 /100 | #295 | Tragic 16.5% |
Immigrants | Senegal | 0.0 /100 | #296 | Tragic 16.5% |
Mexicans | 0.0 /100 | #297 | Tragic 16.5% |
Somalis | 0.0 /100 | #298 | Tragic 16.6% |
Hispanics or Latinos | 0.0 /100 | #299 | Tragic 16.6% |
Bahamians | 0.0 /100 | #300 | Tragic 16.6% |
Guatemalans | 0.0 /100 | #301 | Tragic 16.7% |
Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #302 | Tragic 16.7% |
Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #303 | Tragic 16.8% |
Immigrants | Central America | 0.0 /100 | #304 | Tragic 16.8% |
Immigrants | Grenada | 0.0 /100 | #305 | Tragic 16.8% |
Immigrants | Caribbean | 0.0 /100 | #306 | Tragic 16.9% |
Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #307 | Tragic 16.9% |
Africans | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic 16.9% |
Immigrants | Mexico | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic 17.0% |