Scandinavian vs Tsimshian Female Poverty
COMPARE
Scandinavian
Tsimshian
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Scandinavians
Tsimshian
12.1%
FEMALE POVERTY
98.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
58th/ 347
METRIC RANK
13.1%
FEMALE POVERTY
75.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
150th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Scandinavian vs Tsimshian Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 472,075,178 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Scandinavians and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.611 and weighted average of 12.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 15,626,462 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Tsimshian and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.062 and weighted average of 13.1%, a difference of 7.7%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Scandinavian | Tsimshian |
| Minimum | 3.9% | 2.2% |
| Maximum | 75.0% | 27.8% |
| Range | 71.1% | 25.6% |
| Mean | 18.4% | 14.0% |
| Median | 11.3% | 13.1% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 10.0% | 10.4% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 18.0% | 17.6% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 7.9% | 7.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 16.4% | 7.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 16.2% | 6.9% |
Similar Demographics by Female Poverty
Demographics Similar to Scandinavians by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Scandinavians are Immigrants from Europe (12.1%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Serbia (12.1%, a difference of 0.080%), Estonian (12.1%, a difference of 0.14%), Immigrants from Australia (12.2%, a difference of 0.25%), and Immigrants from Asia (12.2%, a difference of 0.26%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Immigrants | Bulgaria | 98.9 /100 | #51 | Exceptional 12.0% |
| Immigrants | Croatia | 98.7 /100 | #52 | Exceptional 12.0% |
| Immigrants | Austria | 98.7 /100 | #53 | Exceptional 12.0% |
| Immigrants | Philippines | 98.7 /100 | #54 | Exceptional 12.1% |
| Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 98.5 /100 | #55 | Exceptional 12.1% |
| Estonians | 98.3 /100 | #56 | Exceptional 12.1% |
| Immigrants | Serbia | 98.3 /100 | #57 | Exceptional 12.1% |
| Scandinavians | 98.2 /100 | #58 | Exceptional 12.1% |
| Immigrants | Europe | 98.2 /100 | #59 | Exceptional 12.1% |
| Immigrants | Australia | 98.1 /100 | #60 | Exceptional 12.2% |
| Immigrants | Asia | 98.1 /100 | #61 | Exceptional 12.2% |
| Immigrants | Italy | 98.0 /100 | #62 | Exceptional 12.2% |
| Ukrainians | 98.0 /100 | #63 | Exceptional 12.2% |
| Germans | 98.0 /100 | #64 | Exceptional 12.2% |
| Indians (Asian) | 97.9 /100 | #65 | Exceptional 12.2% |
Demographics Similar to Tsimshian by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Tsimshian are Taiwanese (13.1%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Germany (13.1%, a difference of 0.070%), Yugoslavian (13.1%, a difference of 0.19%), Samoan (13.1%, a difference of 0.24%), and Immigrants from Kazakhstan (13.0%, a difference of 0.44%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Immigrants | Malaysia | 80.4 /100 | #143 | Excellent 13.0% |
| Afghans | 79.8 /100 | #144 | Good 13.0% |
| Syrians | 79.6 /100 | #145 | Good 13.0% |
| Immigrants | Peru | 79.1 /100 | #146 | Good 13.0% |
| Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 78.6 /100 | #147 | Good 13.0% |
| Yugoslavians | 76.9 /100 | #148 | Good 13.1% |
| Taiwanese | 75.7 /100 | #149 | Good 13.1% |
| Tsimshian | 75.5 /100 | #150 | Good 13.1% |
| Immigrants | Germany | 74.9 /100 | #151 | Good 13.1% |
| Samoans | 73.6 /100 | #152 | Good 13.1% |
| Immigrants | Fiji | 71.0 /100 | #153 | Good 13.2% |
| Armenians | 70.4 /100 | #154 | Good 13.2% |
| Hungarians | 70.1 /100 | #155 | Good 13.2% |
| Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 69.7 /100 | #156 | Good 13.2% |
| Immigrants | Northern Africa | 68.8 /100 | #157 | Good 13.2% |