Immigrants from Uruguay vs Chippewa Female Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Uruguay
Chippewa
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Uruguay
Chippewa
14.0%
FEMALE POVERTY
14.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
206th/ 347
METRIC RANK
16.7%
FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
302nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Uruguay vs Chippewa Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 133,241,940 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Uruguay and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.113 and weighted average of 14.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 214,995,312 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Chippewa and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.544 and weighted average of 16.7%, a difference of 19.1%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Uruguay | Chippewa |
Minimum | 6.4% | 7.0% |
Maximum | 21.5% | 78.4% |
Range | 15.1% | 71.4% |
Mean | 13.7% | 25.6% |
Median | 13.3% | 20.4% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 11.4% | 15.3% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 15.3% | 31.2% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.9% | 15.8% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.8% | 15.1% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.7% | 15.0% |
Similar Demographics by Female Poverty
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Uruguay by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Uruguay are Ugandan (14.0%, a difference of 0.27%), Spaniard (13.9%, a difference of 0.84%), Immigrants from Western Asia (13.9%, a difference of 1.1%), Immigrants from Eastern Africa (14.2%, a difference of 1.1%), and Hmong (13.9%, a difference of 1.2%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
Immigrants | Lebanon | 25.6 /100 | #199 | Fair 13.8% |
Spanish | 21.4 /100 | #200 | Fair 13.9% |
Immigrants | Kenya | 21.1 /100 | #201 | Fair 13.9% |
Hmong | 21.1 /100 | #202 | Fair 13.9% |
Immigrants | Western Asia | 20.7 /100 | #203 | Fair 13.9% |
Spaniards | 18.9 /100 | #204 | Poor 13.9% |
Ugandans | 15.4 /100 | #205 | Poor 14.0% |
Immigrants | Uruguay | 14.0 /100 | #206 | Poor 14.0% |
Immigrants | Eastern Africa | 9.0 /100 | #207 | Tragic 14.2% |
Immigrants | Azores | 7.9 /100 | #208 | Tragic 14.2% |
Panamanians | 7.7 /100 | #209 | Tragic 14.2% |
Malaysians | 7.4 /100 | #210 | Tragic 14.3% |
Moroccans | 7.2 /100 | #211 | Tragic 14.3% |
Bermudans | 5.5 /100 | #212 | Tragic 14.4% |
Alaskan Athabascans | 5.3 /100 | #213 | Tragic 14.4% |
Demographics Similar to Chippewa by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chippewa are Guatemalan (16.7%, a difference of 0.030%), Bahamian (16.6%, a difference of 0.36%), Hispanic or Latino (16.6%, a difference of 0.40%), Choctaw (16.8%, a difference of 0.61%), and Immigrants from Central America (16.8%, a difference of 0.67%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
Senegalese | 0.0 /100 | #295 | Tragic 16.5% |
Immigrants | Senegal | 0.0 /100 | #296 | Tragic 16.5% |
Mexicans | 0.0 /100 | #297 | Tragic 16.5% |
Somalis | 0.0 /100 | #298 | Tragic 16.6% |
Hispanics or Latinos | 0.0 /100 | #299 | Tragic 16.6% |
Bahamians | 0.0 /100 | #300 | Tragic 16.6% |
Guatemalans | 0.0 /100 | #301 | Tragic 16.7% |
Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #302 | Tragic 16.7% |
Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #303 | Tragic 16.8% |
Immigrants | Central America | 0.0 /100 | #304 | Tragic 16.8% |
Immigrants | Grenada | 0.0 /100 | #305 | Tragic 16.8% |
Immigrants | Caribbean | 0.0 /100 | #306 | Tragic 16.9% |
Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #307 | Tragic 16.9% |
Africans | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic 16.9% |
Immigrants | Mexico | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic 17.0% |