Choctaw Female Poverty
COMPARE
Choctaw
Select to Compare
Female Poverty
Choctaw Female Poverty
16.8%
POVERTY | FEMALES
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
303rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Choctaw Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 269,592,766 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Choctaw and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.540 and weighted average of 16.8%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Choctaw within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.27% in poverty level among females.
It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Choctaw and poverty level among females does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Choctaw influences an upward or downward trend in the level of poverty level among females within an area, or if Choctaw simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of poverty level among females due to other factors.
Demographics Similar to Choctaw by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Choctaw are Immigrants from Central America (16.8%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Grenada (16.8%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Caribbean (16.9%, a difference of 0.33%), Seminole (16.9%, a difference of 0.46%), and African (16.9%, a difference of 0.52%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Immigrants from Senegal | 0.0 /100 | #296 | Tragic 16.5% |
| Mexicans | 0.0 /100 | #297 | Tragic 16.5% |
| Somalis | 0.0 /100 | #298 | Tragic 16.6% |
| Hispanics or Latinos | 0.0 /100 | #299 | Tragic 16.6% |
| Bahamians | 0.0 /100 | #300 | Tragic 16.6% |
| Guatemalans | 0.0 /100 | #301 | Tragic 16.7% |
| Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #302 | Tragic 16.7% |
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #303 | Tragic 16.8% |
| Immigrants from Central America | 0.0 /100 | #304 | Tragic 16.8% |
| Immigrants from Grenada | 0.0 /100 | #305 | Tragic 16.8% |
| Immigrants from Caribbean | 0.0 /100 | #306 | Tragic 16.9% |
| Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #307 | Tragic 16.9% |
| Africans | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic 16.9% |
| Immigrants from Mexico | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic 17.0% |
| Creek | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic 17.0% |
Choctaw Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Choctaw Data | Female Poverty Data |
| Minimum | 0.081% | 10.0% |
| Maximum | 98.1% | 68.1% |
| Range | 98.1% | 58.1% |
| Mean | 22.2% | 23.7% |
| Median | 18.5% | 21.6% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 9.4% | 18.4% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 28.8% | 25.6% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 19.4% | 7.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 18.9% | 9.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 18.7% | 9.5% |
Correlation Details
| Choctaw Percentile | Sample Size | Female Poverty |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.081% | 256,185,942 | 14.8% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.70% | 6,476,917 | 15.7% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.22% | 3,037,239 | 15.7% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.70% | 1,675,222 | 15.3% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.17% | 572,894 | 18.1% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.60% | 421,353 | 14.3% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.18% | 217,387 | 19.9% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.67% | 157,472 | 17.1% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.08% | 104,101 | 16.2% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.56% | 45,089 | 20.7% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.10% | 43,462 | 19.6% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.62% | 34,776 | 21.9% |
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.12% | 22,633 | 20.4% |
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.70% | 96,236 | 16.5% |
[ 7.0% - 7.5% ] 7.19% | 40,091 | 20.1% |
[ 7.5% - 8.0% ] 7.59% | 24,160 | 20.0% |
[ 8.0% - 8.5% ] 8.08% | 13,583 | 25.6% |
[ 8.5% - 9.0% ] 8.61% | 26,829 | 21.1% |
[ 9.0% - 9.5% ] 9.16% | 3,787 | 18.4% |
[ 9.5% - 10.0% ] 9.55% | 9,755 | 21.6% |
[ 9.5% - 10.0% ] 9.87% | 28,634 | 23.5% |
[ 10.5% - 11.0% ] 10.58% | 13,048 | 22.7% |
[ 10.5% - 11.0% ] 10.93% | 4,472 | 20.2% |
[ 11.0% - 11.5% ] 11.41% | 16,242 | 22.0% |
[ 12.0% - 12.5% ] 12.09% | 65,837 | 22.2% |
[ 12.5% - 13.0% ] 12.58% | 11,673 | 20.1% |
[ 12.5% - 13.0% ] 12.87% | 4,826 | 21.3% |
[ 13.0% - 13.5% ] 13.41% | 5,728 | 21.8% |
[ 14.0% - 14.5% ] 14.08% | 6,406 | 24.4% |
[ 14.0% - 14.5% ] 14.38% | 29,855 | 18.0% |
[ 15.0% - 15.5% ] 15.06% | 25,025 | 20.3% |
[ 15.0% - 15.5% ] 15.37% | 1,574 | 24.8% |
[ 15.5% - 16.0% ] 15.95% | 4,665 | 17.0% |
[ 16.5% - 17.0% ] 16.55% | 18,037 | 27.3% |
[ 16.5% - 17.0% ] 16.89% | 14,688 | 24.5% |
[ 17.0% - 17.5% ] 17.35% | 7,872 | 21.4% |
[ 17.5% - 18.0% ] 17.78% | 9,509 | 30.5% |
[ 18.0% - 18.5% ] 18.28% | 9,254 | 22.3% |
[ 18.5% - 19.0% ] 18.81% | 489 | 26.6% |
[ 19.0% - 19.5% ] 19.45% | 45,587 | 25.7% |
[ 19.5% - 20.0% ] 19.93% | 3,869 | 18.4% |
[ 20.0% - 20.5% ] 20.36% | 7,885 | 22.6% |
[ 20.5% - 21.0% ] 20.65% | 3,002 | 18.4% |
[ 21.0% - 21.5% ] 21.45% | 1,478 | 31.2% |
[ 21.5% - 22.0% ] 21.75% | 11,047 | 26.8% |
[ 22.5% - 23.0% ] 22.52% | 746 | 14.7% |
[ 22.5% - 23.0% ] 22.95% | 4,021 | 23.3% |
[ 23.0% - 23.5% ] 23.37% | 2,045 | 28.2% |
[ 23.5% - 24.0% ] 23.84% | 453 | 19.2% |
[ 24.0% - 24.5% ] 24.32% | 2,344 | 34.0% |
[ 25.0% - 25.5% ] 25.01% | 3,327 | 22.7% |
[ 25.5% - 26.0% ] 25.68% | 296 | 24.3% |
[ 26.0% - 26.5% ] 26.46% | 223 | 34.3% |
[ 26.5% - 27.0% ] 26.83% | 2,602 | 19.9% |
[ 27.0% - 27.5% ] 27.23% | 1,998 | 15.8% |
[ 27.5% - 28.0% ] 27.75% | 2,115 | 21.6% |
[ 28.0% - 28.5% ] 28.36% | 871 | 12.7% |
[ 29.0% - 29.5% ] 29.15% | 1,187 | 22.5% |
[ 29.5% - 30.0% ] 29.70% | 101 | 38.1% |
[ 30.0% - 30.5% ] 30.18% | 1,196 | 32.7% |
[ 30.0% - 30.5% ] 30.43% | 46 | 25.0% |
[ 32.0% - 32.5% ] 32.21% | 447 | 41.4% |
[ 32.5% - 33.0% ] 32.53% | 621 | 46.0% |
[ 34.5% - 35.0% ] 34.75% | 141 | 32.6% |
[ 35.5% - 36.0% ] 35.58% | 579 | 21.0% |
[ 36.0% - 36.5% ] 36.03% | 136 | 19.2% |
[ 36.5% - 37.0% ] 36.54% | 156 | 11.0% |
[ 37.5% - 38.0% ] 37.94% | 282 | 28.9% |
[ 43.0% - 43.5% ] 43.42% | 76 | 23.3% |
[ 45.0% - 45.5% ] 45.40% | 1,240 | 48.9% |
[ 46.5% - 47.0% ] 46.58% | 73 | 18.5% |
[ 50.5% - 51.0% ] 50.94% | 53 | 10.0% |
[ 75.0% - 75.5% ] 75.03% | 4,298 | 32.4% |
[ 79.5% - 80.0% ] 79.76% | 573 | 10.6% |
[ 80.0% - 80.5% ] 80.35% | 514 | 51.9% |
[ 98.0% - 98.5% ] 98.14% | 376 | 68.1% |