Scandinavian vs Immigrants from China Female Poverty
COMPARE
Scandinavian
Immigrants from China
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Scandinavians
Immigrants from China
12.1%
FEMALE POVERTY
98.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
58th/ 347
METRIC RANK
12.5%
FEMALE POVERTY
94.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
102nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Scandinavian vs Immigrants from China Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 472,075,178 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Scandinavians and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.611 and weighted average of 12.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 456,442,741 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from China and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.210 and weighted average of 12.5%, a difference of 3.1%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Scandinavian | Immigrants from China |
| Minimum | 3.9% | 2.6% |
| Maximum | 75.0% | 26.5% |
| Range | 71.1% | 23.9% |
| Mean | 18.4% | 11.9% |
| Median | 11.3% | 11.5% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 10.0% | 9.7% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 18.0% | 13.0% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 7.9% | 3.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 16.4% | 4.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 16.2% | 4.1% |
Similar Demographics by Female Poverty
Demographics Similar to Scandinavians by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Scandinavians are Immigrants from Europe (12.1%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Serbia (12.1%, a difference of 0.080%), Estonian (12.1%, a difference of 0.14%), Immigrants from Australia (12.2%, a difference of 0.25%), and Immigrants from Asia (12.2%, a difference of 0.26%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Immigrants | Bulgaria | 98.9 /100 | #51 | Exceptional 12.0% |
| Immigrants | Croatia | 98.7 /100 | #52 | Exceptional 12.0% |
| Immigrants | Austria | 98.7 /100 | #53 | Exceptional 12.0% |
| Immigrants | Philippines | 98.7 /100 | #54 | Exceptional 12.1% |
| Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 98.5 /100 | #55 | Exceptional 12.1% |
| Estonians | 98.3 /100 | #56 | Exceptional 12.1% |
| Immigrants | Serbia | 98.3 /100 | #57 | Exceptional 12.1% |
| Scandinavians | 98.2 /100 | #58 | Exceptional 12.1% |
| Immigrants | Europe | 98.2 /100 | #59 | Exceptional 12.1% |
| Immigrants | Australia | 98.1 /100 | #60 | Exceptional 12.2% |
| Immigrants | Asia | 98.1 /100 | #61 | Exceptional 12.2% |
| Immigrants | Italy | 98.0 /100 | #62 | Exceptional 12.2% |
| Ukrainians | 98.0 /100 | #63 | Exceptional 12.2% |
| Germans | 98.0 /100 | #64 | Exceptional 12.2% |
| Indians (Asian) | 97.9 /100 | #65 | Exceptional 12.2% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from China by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from China are Slavic (12.5%, a difference of 0.020%), Palestinian (12.5%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Latvia (12.5%, a difference of 0.15%), Tlingit-Haida (12.5%, a difference of 0.15%), and Scottish (12.5%, a difference of 0.22%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Immigrants | South Africa | 95.4 /100 | #95 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| British | 95.2 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Australians | 95.2 /100 | #97 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Native Hawaiians | 95.1 /100 | #98 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Romanians | 95.1 /100 | #99 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Immigrants | Latvia | 94.8 /100 | #100 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Tlingit-Haida | 94.8 /100 | #101 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Immigrants | China | 94.5 /100 | #102 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Slavs | 94.5 /100 | #103 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Palestinians | 94.3 /100 | #104 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Scottish | 94.1 /100 | #105 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Immigrants | Turkey | 93.8 /100 | #106 | Exceptional 12.6% |
| Laotians | 93.4 /100 | #107 | Exceptional 12.6% |
| Portuguese | 93.1 /100 | #108 | Exceptional 12.6% |
| Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 93.1 /100 | #109 | Exceptional 12.6% |