Uruguayan vs Chippewa Female Poverty
COMPARE
Uruguayan
Chippewa
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Uruguayans
Chippewa
13.6%
FEMALE POVERTY
39.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
189th/ 347
METRIC RANK
16.7%
FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
302nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Uruguayan vs Chippewa Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 144,759,999 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Uruguayans and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.022 and weighted average of 13.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 214,995,312 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Chippewa and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.544 and weighted average of 16.7%, a difference of 23.1%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Uruguayan | Chippewa |
Minimum | 2.5% | 7.0% |
Maximum | 24.1% | 78.4% |
Range | 21.6% | 71.4% |
Mean | 11.4% | 25.6% |
Median | 12.3% | 20.4% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 8.0% | 15.3% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 14.4% | 31.2% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.5% | 15.8% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.4% | 15.1% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.3% | 15.0% |
Similar Demographics by Female Poverty
Demographics Similar to Uruguayans by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Uruguayans are Hawaiian (13.6%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Venezuela (13.6%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Portugal (13.6%, a difference of 0.17%), Immigrants from Cameroon (13.5%, a difference of 0.22%), and Immigrants from Sierra Leone (13.5%, a difference of 0.33%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
Immigrants | Colombia | 44.5 /100 | #182 | Average 13.5% |
Kenyans | 43.8 /100 | #183 | Average 13.5% |
Immigrants | Sierra Leone | 43.2 /100 | #184 | Average 13.5% |
Immigrants | Cameroon | 42.0 /100 | #185 | Average 13.5% |
Immigrants | Portugal | 41.5 /100 | #186 | Average 13.6% |
Immigrants | Venezuela | 41.0 /100 | #187 | Average 13.6% |
Hawaiians | 39.9 /100 | #188 | Fair 13.6% |
Uruguayans | 39.8 /100 | #189 | Fair 13.6% |
Sierra Leoneans | 33.1 /100 | #190 | Fair 13.7% |
Immigrants | Kuwait | 32.7 /100 | #191 | Fair 13.7% |
Immigrants | Costa Rica | 31.9 /100 | #192 | Fair 13.7% |
Iraqis | 31.8 /100 | #193 | Fair 13.7% |
Delaware | 31.1 /100 | #194 | Fair 13.7% |
Immigrants | South America | 30.6 /100 | #195 | Fair 13.7% |
South American Indians | 28.9 /100 | #196 | Fair 13.7% |
Demographics Similar to Chippewa by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chippewa are Guatemalan (16.7%, a difference of 0.030%), Bahamian (16.6%, a difference of 0.36%), Hispanic or Latino (16.6%, a difference of 0.40%), Choctaw (16.8%, a difference of 0.61%), and Immigrants from Central America (16.8%, a difference of 0.67%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
Senegalese | 0.0 /100 | #295 | Tragic 16.5% |
Immigrants | Senegal | 0.0 /100 | #296 | Tragic 16.5% |
Mexicans | 0.0 /100 | #297 | Tragic 16.5% |
Somalis | 0.0 /100 | #298 | Tragic 16.6% |
Hispanics or Latinos | 0.0 /100 | #299 | Tragic 16.6% |
Bahamians | 0.0 /100 | #300 | Tragic 16.6% |
Guatemalans | 0.0 /100 | #301 | Tragic 16.7% |
Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #302 | Tragic 16.7% |
Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #303 | Tragic 16.8% |
Immigrants | Central America | 0.0 /100 | #304 | Tragic 16.8% |
Immigrants | Grenada | 0.0 /100 | #305 | Tragic 16.8% |
Immigrants | Caribbean | 0.0 /100 | #306 | Tragic 16.9% |
Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #307 | Tragic 16.9% |
Africans | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic 16.9% |
Immigrants | Mexico | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic 17.0% |