Scandinavian vs Bhutanese Female Poverty
COMPARE
Scandinavian
Bhutanese
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Scandinavians
Bhutanese
12.1%
FEMALE POVERTY
98.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
58th/ 347
METRIC RANK
11.3%
FEMALE POVERTY
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
12th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Scandinavian vs Bhutanese Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 472,075,178 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Scandinavians and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.611 and weighted average of 12.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 455,052,143 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Bhutanese and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.207 and weighted average of 11.3%, a difference of 7.6%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Scandinavian | Bhutanese |
| Minimum | 3.9% | 2.5% |
| Maximum | 75.0% | 66.7% |
| Range | 71.1% | 64.2% |
| Mean | 18.4% | 11.1% |
| Median | 11.3% | 9.4% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 10.0% | 7.2% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 18.0% | 12.7% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 7.9% | 5.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 16.4% | 8.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 16.2% | 8.5% |
Similar Demographics by Female Poverty
Demographics Similar to Scandinavians by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Scandinavians are Immigrants from Europe (12.1%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Serbia (12.1%, a difference of 0.080%), Estonian (12.1%, a difference of 0.14%), Immigrants from Australia (12.2%, a difference of 0.25%), and Immigrants from Asia (12.2%, a difference of 0.26%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Immigrants | Bulgaria | 98.9 /100 | #51 | Exceptional 12.0% |
| Immigrants | Croatia | 98.7 /100 | #52 | Exceptional 12.0% |
| Immigrants | Austria | 98.7 /100 | #53 | Exceptional 12.0% |
| Immigrants | Philippines | 98.7 /100 | #54 | Exceptional 12.1% |
| Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 98.5 /100 | #55 | Exceptional 12.1% |
| Estonians | 98.3 /100 | #56 | Exceptional 12.1% |
| Immigrants | Serbia | 98.3 /100 | #57 | Exceptional 12.1% |
| Scandinavians | 98.2 /100 | #58 | Exceptional 12.1% |
| Immigrants | Europe | 98.2 /100 | #59 | Exceptional 12.1% |
| Immigrants | Australia | 98.1 /100 | #60 | Exceptional 12.2% |
| Immigrants | Asia | 98.1 /100 | #61 | Exceptional 12.2% |
| Immigrants | Italy | 98.0 /100 | #62 | Exceptional 12.2% |
| Ukrainians | 98.0 /100 | #63 | Exceptional 12.2% |
| Germans | 98.0 /100 | #64 | Exceptional 12.2% |
| Indians (Asian) | 97.9 /100 | #65 | Exceptional 12.2% |
Demographics Similar to Bhutanese by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Bhutanese are Immigrants from Lithuania (11.3%, a difference of 0.010%), Maltese (11.2%, a difference of 0.46%), Immigrants from Hong Kong (11.2%, a difference of 0.57%), Lithuanian (11.4%, a difference of 0.97%), and Latvian (11.4%, a difference of 1.3%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Filipinos | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 10.9% |
| Immigrants | Ireland | 99.9 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 11.0% |
| Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs | 99.9 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 11.0% |
| Immigrants | South Central Asia | 99.9 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 11.1% |
| Bulgarians | 99.9 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 11.1% |
| Immigrants | Hong Kong | 99.9 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 11.2% |
| Maltese | 99.9 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 11.2% |
| Bhutanese | 99.9 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 11.3% |
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.9 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 11.3% |
| Lithuanians | 99.8 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 11.4% |
| Latvians | 99.8 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 11.4% |
| Immigrants | Bolivia | 99.8 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 11.5% |
| Bolivians | 99.8 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 11.5% |
| Immigrants | Scotland | 99.8 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 11.5% |
| Norwegians | 99.8 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 11.5% |