Kiowa vs Hopi Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Kiowa
Hopi
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Kiowa
Hopi
26.9%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
324th/ 347
METRIC RANK
28.0%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
330th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Kiowa vs Hopi Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 55,984,677 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Kiowa and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.037 and weighted average of 26.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 74,526,987 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Hopi and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.181 and weighted average of 28.0%, a difference of 4.1%.
![Kiowa vs Hopi Single Female Poverty](/correlation-charts/metric-comparison/single-female-poverty/kiowa-vs-hopi-single-female-poverty-chart.webp)
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Kiowa | Hopi |
Minimum | 20.0% | 2.4% |
Maximum | 69.2% | 61.3% |
Range | 49.2% | 58.9% |
Mean | 34.9% | 33.2% |
Median | 31.9% | 34.3% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 25.4% | 24.4% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 41.4% | 41.2% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 16.0% | 16.8% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 12.6% | 13.7% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 12.4% | 13.4% |
Demographics Similar to Kiowa and Hopi by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Kiowa are Chippewa (26.8%, a difference of 0.41%), Seminole (26.8%, a difference of 0.52%), Choctaw (27.2%, a difference of 0.98%), Yup'ik (26.6%, a difference of 1.3%), and Creek (27.4%, a difference of 1.9%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Hopi are Native/Alaskan (28.2%, a difference of 0.64%), Menominee (27.8%, a difference of 0.71%), Yakama (28.3%, a difference of 0.90%), Apache (27.7%, a difference of 1.2%), and Ute (28.4%, a difference of 1.3%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
Ottawa | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 26.0% |
Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 26.3% |
Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 26.4% |
Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 26.4% |
Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 26.6% |
Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 26.8% |
Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 26.8% |
Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 26.9% |
Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 27.2% |
Creek | 0.0 /100 | #326 | Tragic 27.4% |
Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #327 | Tragic 27.5% |
Apache | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 27.7% |
Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 27.8% |
Hopi | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 28.0% |
Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 28.2% |
Yakama | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 28.3% |
Ute | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 28.4% |
Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 28.6% |
Immigrants | Yemen | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 28.9% |
Colville | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 29.1% |
Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 29.4% |