Inupiat vs Chickasaw Poverty
COMPARE
Inupiat
Chickasaw
Poverty
Poverty Comparison
Inupiat
Chickasaw
15.1%
POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
287th/ 347
METRIC RANK
14.7%
POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
272nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Inupiat vs Chickasaw Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 96,319,332 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Inupiat and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.220 and weighted average of 15.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,672,043 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.009 and weighted average of 14.7%, a difference of 2.7%.
Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Inupiat | Chickasaw |
Minimum | 1.4% | 0.99% |
Maximum | 59.1% | 35.7% |
Range | 57.7% | 34.7% |
Mean | 21.3% | 16.2% |
Median | 18.4% | 15.3% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 10.3% | 13.3% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 33.9% | 18.7% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 23.5% | 5.4% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 13.3% | 5.4% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 13.2% | 5.4% |
Demographics Similar to Inupiat and Chickasaw by Poverty
In terms of poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Inupiat are Yaqui (15.1%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Belize (15.1%, a difference of 0.13%), Immigrants from Latin America (15.0%, a difference of 0.21%), Vietnamese (15.0%, a difference of 0.47%), and West Indian (15.0%, a difference of 0.53%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Shoshone (14.7%, a difference of 0.040%), Spanish American (14.7%, a difference of 0.53%), Central American (14.6%, a difference of 0.63%), Immigrants from Cuba (14.6%, a difference of 0.77%), and Barbadian (14.8%, a difference of 0.93%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Poverty |
Immigrants | Cuba | 0.1 /100 | #269 | Tragic 14.6% |
Central Americans | 0.1 /100 | #270 | Tragic 14.6% |
Shoshone | 0.0 /100 | #271 | Tragic 14.7% |
Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #272 | Tragic 14.7% |
Spanish Americans | 0.0 /100 | #273 | Tragic 14.7% |
Barbadians | 0.0 /100 | #274 | Tragic 14.8% |
Immigrants | West Indies | 0.0 /100 | #275 | Tragic 14.8% |
Immigrants | Bahamas | 0.0 /100 | #276 | Tragic 14.8% |
Bangladeshis | 0.0 /100 | #277 | Tragic 14.8% |
Belizeans | 0.0 /100 | #278 | Tragic 14.8% |
Immigrants | St. Vincent and the Grenadines | 0.0 /100 | #279 | Tragic 14.9% |
Haitians | 0.0 /100 | #280 | Tragic 14.9% |
Immigrants | Barbados | 0.0 /100 | #281 | Tragic 14.9% |
Comanche | 0.0 /100 | #282 | Tragic 15.0% |
Immigrants | Haiti | 0.0 /100 | #283 | Tragic 15.0% |
West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #284 | Tragic 15.0% |
Vietnamese | 0.0 /100 | #285 | Tragic 15.0% |
Immigrants | Latin America | 0.0 /100 | #286 | Tragic 15.0% |
Inupiat | 0.0 /100 | #287 | Tragic 15.1% |
Yaqui | 0.0 /100 | #288 | Tragic 15.1% |
Immigrants | Belize | 0.0 /100 | #289 | Tragic 15.1% |