Immigrants from Jamaica vs Chickasaw Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Jamaica
Chickasaw
Poverty
Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Jamaica
Chickasaw
14.4%
POVERTY
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
264th/ 347
METRIC RANK
14.7%
POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
272nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Jamaica vs Chickasaw Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 301,608,738 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Jamaica and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.395 and weighted average of 14.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,672,043 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.009 and weighted average of 14.7%, a difference of 1.6%.
Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Jamaica | Chickasaw |
| Minimum | 5.2% | 0.99% |
| Maximum | 55.6% | 35.7% |
| Range | 50.4% | 34.7% |
| Mean | 14.9% | 16.2% |
| Median | 13.9% | 15.3% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 11.6% | 13.3% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 15.8% | 18.7% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.3% | 5.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.9% | 5.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.9% | 5.4% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Jamaica and Chickasaw by Poverty
In terms of poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Jamaica are Jamaican (14.4%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Guyana (14.5%, a difference of 0.13%), Guyanese (14.5%, a difference of 0.30%), Immigrants from Liberia (14.4%, a difference of 0.43%), and Cherokee (14.4%, a difference of 0.60%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Shoshone (14.7%, a difference of 0.040%), Spanish American (14.7%, a difference of 0.53%), Central American (14.6%, a difference of 0.63%), Immigrants from Cuba (14.6%, a difference of 0.77%), and Subsaharan African (14.5%, a difference of 0.92%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Poverty |
| Ottawa | 0.1 /100 | #258 | Tragic 14.3% |
| Immigrants | Nicaragua | 0.1 /100 | #259 | Tragic 14.3% |
| Cape Verdeans | 0.1 /100 | #260 | Tragic 14.4% |
| Cherokee | 0.1 /100 | #261 | Tragic 14.4% |
| Immigrants | Liberia | 0.1 /100 | #262 | Tragic 14.4% |
| Jamaicans | 0.1 /100 | #263 | Tragic 14.4% |
| Immigrants | Jamaica | 0.1 /100 | #264 | Tragic 14.4% |
| Immigrants | Guyana | 0.1 /100 | #265 | Tragic 14.5% |
| Guyanese | 0.1 /100 | #266 | Tragic 14.5% |
| Iroquois | 0.1 /100 | #267 | Tragic 14.5% |
| Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.1 /100 | #268 | Tragic 14.5% |
| Immigrants | Cuba | 0.1 /100 | #269 | Tragic 14.6% |
| Central Americans | 0.1 /100 | #270 | Tragic 14.6% |
| Shoshone | 0.0 /100 | #271 | Tragic 14.7% |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #272 | Tragic 14.7% |
| Spanish Americans | 0.0 /100 | #273 | Tragic 14.7% |
| Barbadians | 0.0 /100 | #274 | Tragic 14.8% |
| Immigrants | West Indies | 0.0 /100 | #275 | Tragic 14.8% |
| Immigrants | Bahamas | 0.0 /100 | #276 | Tragic 14.8% |
| Bangladeshis | 0.0 /100 | #277 | Tragic 14.8% |
| Belizeans | 0.0 /100 | #278 | Tragic 14.8% |