Spanish American Indian vs Chickasaw Poverty

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 73,142,105 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Spanish American Indians and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.105 and weighted average of 14.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,672,043 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.009 and weighted average of 14.7%, a difference of 3.1%.

In terms of poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Spanish American Indians are Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago (14.2%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from El Salvador (14.3%, a difference of 0.36%), Immigrants from Ecuador (14.3%, a difference of 0.45%), Mexican American Indian (14.3%, a difference of 0.47%), and Trinidadian and Tobagonian (14.3%, a difference of 0.51%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Shoshone (14.7%, a difference of 0.040%), Central American (14.6%, a difference of 0.63%), Immigrants from Cuba (14.6%, a difference of 0.77%), Subsaharan African (14.5%, a difference of 0.92%), and Iroquois (14.5%, a difference of 0.96%).