Shoshone vs Chickasaw Poverty
COMPARE
Shoshone
Chickasaw
Poverty
Poverty Comparison
Shoshone
Chickasaw
14.7%
POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
271st/ 347
METRIC RANK
14.7%
POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
272nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Shoshone vs Chickasaw Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 66,616,342 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Shoshone and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.517 and weighted average of 14.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,672,043 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.009 and weighted average of 14.7%, a difference of 0.040%.
Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Shoshone | Chickasaw |
| Minimum | 5.7% | 0.99% |
| Maximum | 31.5% | 35.7% |
| Range | 25.8% | 34.7% |
| Mean | 17.1% | 16.2% |
| Median | 14.9% | 15.3% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 11.0% | 13.3% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 23.8% | 18.7% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 12.8% | 5.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 7.1% | 5.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 7.0% | 5.4% |
Demographics Similar to Shoshone and Chickasaw by Poverty
In terms of poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Shoshone are Central American (14.6%, a difference of 0.58%), Spanish American (14.7%, a difference of 0.58%), Immigrants from Cuba (14.6%, a difference of 0.72%), Subsaharan African (14.5%, a difference of 0.88%), and Iroquois (14.5%, a difference of 0.92%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Spanish American (14.7%, a difference of 0.53%), Central American (14.6%, a difference of 0.63%), Immigrants from Cuba (14.6%, a difference of 0.77%), Subsaharan African (14.5%, a difference of 0.92%), and Barbadian (14.8%, a difference of 0.93%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Poverty |
| Cherokee | 0.1 /100 | #261 | Tragic 14.4% |
| Immigrants | Liberia | 0.1 /100 | #262 | Tragic 14.4% |
| Jamaicans | 0.1 /100 | #263 | Tragic 14.4% |
| Immigrants | Jamaica | 0.1 /100 | #264 | Tragic 14.4% |
| Immigrants | Guyana | 0.1 /100 | #265 | Tragic 14.5% |
| Guyanese | 0.1 /100 | #266 | Tragic 14.5% |
| Iroquois | 0.1 /100 | #267 | Tragic 14.5% |
| Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.1 /100 | #268 | Tragic 14.5% |
| Immigrants | Cuba | 0.1 /100 | #269 | Tragic 14.6% |
| Central Americans | 0.1 /100 | #270 | Tragic 14.6% |
| Shoshone | 0.0 /100 | #271 | Tragic 14.7% |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #272 | Tragic 14.7% |
| Spanish Americans | 0.0 /100 | #273 | Tragic 14.7% |
| Barbadians | 0.0 /100 | #274 | Tragic 14.8% |
| Immigrants | West Indies | 0.0 /100 | #275 | Tragic 14.8% |
| Immigrants | Bahamas | 0.0 /100 | #276 | Tragic 14.8% |
| Bangladeshis | 0.0 /100 | #277 | Tragic 14.8% |
| Belizeans | 0.0 /100 | #278 | Tragic 14.8% |
| Immigrants | St. Vincent and the Grenadines | 0.0 /100 | #279 | Tragic 14.9% |
| Haitians | 0.0 /100 | #280 | Tragic 14.9% |
| Immigrants | Barbados | 0.0 /100 | #281 | Tragic 14.9% |