Inupiat vs Iroquois Poverty
COMPARE
Inupiat
Iroquois
Poverty
Poverty Comparison
Inupiat
Iroquois
15.1%
POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
287th/ 347
METRIC RANK
14.5%
POVERTY
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
267th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Inupiat vs Iroquois Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 96,319,332 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Inupiat and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.220 and weighted average of 15.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 207,260,268 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Iroquois and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.624 and weighted average of 14.5%, a difference of 3.7%.
![Inupiat vs Iroquois Poverty](/correlation-charts/metric-comparison/poverty/inupiat-vs-iroquois-poverty-chart.webp)
Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Inupiat | Iroquois |
Minimum | 1.4% | 3.3% |
Maximum | 59.1% | 100.0% |
Range | 57.7% | 96.7% |
Mean | 21.3% | 21.2% |
Median | 18.4% | 15.1% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 10.3% | 12.3% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 33.9% | 22.6% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 23.5% | 10.3% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 13.3% | 18.5% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 13.2% | 18.3% |
Demographics Similar to Inupiat and Iroquois by Poverty
In terms of poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Inupiat are Immigrants from Latin America (15.0%, a difference of 0.21%), Vietnamese (15.0%, a difference of 0.47%), West Indian (15.0%, a difference of 0.53%), Immigrants from Haiti (15.0%, a difference of 0.63%), and Comanche (15.0%, a difference of 0.75%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Iroquois are Subsaharan African (14.5%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Cuba (14.6%, a difference of 0.19%), Central American (14.6%, a difference of 0.33%), Shoshone (14.7%, a difference of 0.92%), and Chickasaw (14.7%, a difference of 0.96%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Poverty |
Iroquois | 0.1 /100 | #267 | Tragic 14.5% |
Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.1 /100 | #268 | Tragic 14.5% |
Immigrants | Cuba | 0.1 /100 | #269 | Tragic 14.6% |
Central Americans | 0.1 /100 | #270 | Tragic 14.6% |
Shoshone | 0.0 /100 | #271 | Tragic 14.7% |
Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #272 | Tragic 14.7% |
Spanish Americans | 0.0 /100 | #273 | Tragic 14.7% |
Barbadians | 0.0 /100 | #274 | Tragic 14.8% |
Immigrants | West Indies | 0.0 /100 | #275 | Tragic 14.8% |
Immigrants | Bahamas | 0.0 /100 | #276 | Tragic 14.8% |
Bangladeshis | 0.0 /100 | #277 | Tragic 14.8% |
Belizeans | 0.0 /100 | #278 | Tragic 14.8% |
Immigrants | St. Vincent and the Grenadines | 0.0 /100 | #279 | Tragic 14.9% |
Haitians | 0.0 /100 | #280 | Tragic 14.9% |
Immigrants | Barbados | 0.0 /100 | #281 | Tragic 14.9% |
Comanche | 0.0 /100 | #282 | Tragic 15.0% |
Immigrants | Haiti | 0.0 /100 | #283 | Tragic 15.0% |
West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #284 | Tragic 15.0% |
Vietnamese | 0.0 /100 | #285 | Tragic 15.0% |
Immigrants | Latin America | 0.0 /100 | #286 | Tragic 15.0% |
Inupiat | 0.0 /100 | #287 | Tragic 15.1% |