Immigrants from Latin America vs Chickasaw Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Latin America
Chickasaw
Poverty
Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Latin America
Chickasaw
15.0%
POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
286th/ 347
METRIC RANK
14.7%
POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
272nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Latin America vs Chickasaw Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 557,920,338 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Latin America and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.347 and weighted average of 15.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,672,043 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.009 and weighted average of 14.7%, a difference of 2.5%.
Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Latin America | Chickasaw |
| Minimum | 9.8% | 0.99% |
| Maximum | 70.2% | 35.7% |
| Range | 60.4% | 34.7% |
| Mean | 16.7% | 16.2% |
| Median | 15.7% | 15.3% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 12.9% | 13.3% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 17.9% | 18.7% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.0% | 5.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.9% | 5.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.9% | 5.4% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Latin America and Chickasaw by Poverty
In terms of poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Latin America are Inupiat (15.1%, a difference of 0.21%), Yaqui (15.1%, a difference of 0.22%), Vietnamese (15.0%, a difference of 0.26%), West Indian (15.0%, a difference of 0.32%), and Immigrants from Belize (15.1%, a difference of 0.34%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Shoshone (14.7%, a difference of 0.040%), Spanish American (14.7%, a difference of 0.53%), Central American (14.6%, a difference of 0.63%), Immigrants from Cuba (14.6%, a difference of 0.77%), and Barbadian (14.8%, a difference of 0.93%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Poverty |
| Immigrants | Cuba | 0.1 /100 | #269 | Tragic 14.6% |
| Central Americans | 0.1 /100 | #270 | Tragic 14.6% |
| Shoshone | 0.0 /100 | #271 | Tragic 14.7% |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #272 | Tragic 14.7% |
| Spanish Americans | 0.0 /100 | #273 | Tragic 14.7% |
| Barbadians | 0.0 /100 | #274 | Tragic 14.8% |
| Immigrants | West Indies | 0.0 /100 | #275 | Tragic 14.8% |
| Immigrants | Bahamas | 0.0 /100 | #276 | Tragic 14.8% |
| Bangladeshis | 0.0 /100 | #277 | Tragic 14.8% |
| Belizeans | 0.0 /100 | #278 | Tragic 14.8% |
| Immigrants | St. Vincent and the Grenadines | 0.0 /100 | #279 | Tragic 14.9% |
| Haitians | 0.0 /100 | #280 | Tragic 14.9% |
| Immigrants | Barbados | 0.0 /100 | #281 | Tragic 14.9% |
| Comanche | 0.0 /100 | #282 | Tragic 15.0% |
| Immigrants | Haiti | 0.0 /100 | #283 | Tragic 15.0% |
| West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #284 | Tragic 15.0% |
| Vietnamese | 0.0 /100 | #285 | Tragic 15.0% |
| Immigrants | Latin America | 0.0 /100 | #286 | Tragic 15.0% |
| Inupiat | 0.0 /100 | #287 | Tragic 15.1% |
| Yaqui | 0.0 /100 | #288 | Tragic 15.1% |
| Immigrants | Belize | 0.0 /100 | #289 | Tragic 15.1% |