Ethiopian vs Swiss Married-Couple Family Poverty
COMPARE
Ethiopian
Swiss
Married-Couple Family Poverty
Married-Couple Family Poverty Comparison
Ethiopians
Swiss
5.1%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
68.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
161st/ 347
METRIC RANK
4.3%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
99.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
43rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Ethiopian vs Swiss Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 222,211,608 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Ethiopians and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.393 and weighted average of 5.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 457,863,093 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Swiss and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.685 and weighted average of 4.3%, a difference of 19.1%.
Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Ethiopian | Swiss |
| Minimum | 1.1% | 0.49% |
| Maximum | 22.9% | 52.4% |
| Range | 21.8% | 51.9% |
| Mean | 6.0% | 8.1% |
| Median | 4.6% | 4.4% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.3% | 3.4% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 6.3% | 7.8% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.0% | 4.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.0% | 9.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.9% | 9.7% |
Similar Demographics by Married-Couple Family Poverty
Demographics Similar to Ethiopians by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Ethiopians are Pennsylvania German (5.1%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Jordan (5.1%, a difference of 0.22%), Immigrants from South Eastern Asia (5.1%, a difference of 0.31%), Immigrants from Saudi Arabia (5.1%, a difference of 0.31%), and Argentinean (5.1%, a difference of 0.36%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
| Delaware | 73.7 /100 | #154 | Good 5.1% |
| Immigrants | Ethiopia | 72.4 /100 | #155 | Good 5.1% |
| Sri Lankans | 72.2 /100 | #156 | Good 5.1% |
| Argentineans | 70.7 /100 | #157 | Good 5.1% |
| Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 70.4 /100 | #158 | Good 5.1% |
| Immigrants | Saudi Arabia | 70.3 /100 | #159 | Good 5.1% |
| Pennsylvania Germans | 68.5 /100 | #160 | Good 5.1% |
| Ethiopians | 68.1 /100 | #161 | Good 5.1% |
| Immigrants | Jordan | 66.5 /100 | #162 | Good 5.1% |
| Sierra Leoneans | 64.1 /100 | #163 | Good 5.1% |
| Hawaiians | 62.3 /100 | #164 | Good 5.1% |
| Immigrants | Malaysia | 62.2 /100 | #165 | Good 5.1% |
| Paraguayans | 61.5 /100 | #166 | Good 5.1% |
| Costa Ricans | 61.5 /100 | #167 | Good 5.1% |
| Immigrants | Uganda | 54.9 /100 | #168 | Average 5.2% |
Demographics Similar to Swiss by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Swiss are Immigrants from Japan (4.3%, a difference of 0.38%), Serbian (4.3%, a difference of 0.39%), British (4.3%, a difference of 0.42%), Scottish (4.3%, a difference of 0.44%), and Immigrants from South Central Asia (4.3%, a difference of 0.54%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
| English | 99.9 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 4.2% |
| Iranians | 99.9 /100 | #37 | Exceptional 4.2% |
| Belgians | 99.9 /100 | #38 | Exceptional 4.2% |
| Immigrants | Northern Europe | 99.8 /100 | #39 | Exceptional 4.2% |
| French Canadians | 99.8 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 4.2% |
| Northern Europeans | 99.8 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| Scottish | 99.8 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| Swiss | 99.8 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| Immigrants | Japan | 99.8 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| Serbians | 99.8 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| British | 99.8 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| Immigrants | South Central Asia | 99.8 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| Australians | 99.7 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| Turks | 99.7 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| Burmese | 99.7 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 4.3% |