Celtic vs Liberian Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Celtic
Liberian
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Celtics
Liberians
22.7%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
0.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
260th/ 347
METRIC RANK
22.4%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
1.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
246th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Celtic vs Liberian Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 167,592,415 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Celtics and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.360 and weighted average of 22.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 117,657,601 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Liberians and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.177 and weighted average of 22.4%, a difference of 1.5%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Celtic | Liberian |
| Minimum | 11.1% | 0.74% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 58.7% |
| Range | 88.9% | 58.0% |
| Mean | 33.1% | 23.0% |
| Median | 27.8% | 21.7% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 22.5% | 18.3% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 39.6% | 27.2% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 17.1% | 9.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 16.9% | 10.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 16.7% | 10.4% |
Demographics Similar to Celtics and Liberians by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Celtics are White/Caucasian (22.7%, a difference of 0.080%), Bahamian (22.7%, a difference of 0.21%), Immigrants from Cabo Verde (22.8%, a difference of 0.27%), Sudanese (22.6%, a difference of 0.41%), and British West Indian (22.8%, a difference of 0.52%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Liberians are Immigrants from El Salvador (22.4%, a difference of 0.060%), Belizean (22.4%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Caribbean (22.4%, a difference of 0.17%), Immigrants from Bahamas (22.5%, a difference of 0.32%), and Immigrants from Bangladesh (22.3%, a difference of 0.37%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| West Indians | 1.9 /100 | #243 | Tragic 22.3% |
| Immigrants | Middle Africa | 1.9 /100 | #244 | Tragic 22.3% |
| Immigrants | Bangladesh | 1.8 /100 | #245 | Tragic 22.3% |
| Liberians | 1.4 /100 | #246 | Tragic 22.4% |
| Immigrants | El Salvador | 1.4 /100 | #247 | Tragic 22.4% |
| Belizeans | 1.4 /100 | #248 | Tragic 22.4% |
| Immigrants | Caribbean | 1.3 /100 | #249 | Tragic 22.4% |
| Immigrants | Bahamas | 1.2 /100 | #250 | Tragic 22.5% |
| Immigrants | West Indies | 1.0 /100 | #251 | Tragic 22.5% |
| Delaware | 1.0 /100 | #252 | Tragic 22.5% |
| Immigrants | Liberia | 0.9 /100 | #253 | Tragic 22.5% |
| Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 0.8 /100 | #254 | Tragic 22.6% |
| Immigrants | Sudan | 0.8 /100 | #255 | Tragic 22.6% |
| Immigrants | Belize | 0.8 /100 | #256 | Tragic 22.6% |
| Sudanese | 0.7 /100 | #257 | Tragic 22.6% |
| Bahamians | 0.6 /100 | #258 | Tragic 22.7% |
| Whites/Caucasians | 0.6 /100 | #259 | Tragic 22.7% |
| Celtics | 0.5 /100 | #260 | Tragic 22.7% |
| Immigrants | Cabo Verde | 0.4 /100 | #261 | Tragic 22.8% |
| British West Indians | 0.4 /100 | #262 | Tragic 22.8% |
| Scotch-Irish | 0.3 /100 | #263 | Tragic 22.9% |