Celtic vs Senegalese Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Celtic
Senegalese
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Celtics
Senegalese
22.7%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
0.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
260th/ 347
METRIC RANK
23.0%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
0.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
267th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Celtic vs Senegalese Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 167,592,415 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Celtics and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.360 and weighted average of 22.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 77,927,948 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Senegalese and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.043 and weighted average of 23.0%, a difference of 1.4%.

Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Celtic | Senegalese |
| Minimum | 11.1% | 4.5% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 52.6% |
| Range | 88.9% | 48.1% |
| Mean | 33.1% | 22.3% |
| Median | 27.8% | 22.7% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 22.5% | 16.3% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 39.6% | 26.2% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 17.1% | 9.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 16.9% | 8.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 16.7% | 8.5% |
Demographics Similar to Celtics and Senegalese by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Celtics are White/Caucasian (22.7%, a difference of 0.080%), Bahamian (22.7%, a difference of 0.21%), Immigrants from Cabo Verde (22.8%, a difference of 0.27%), Sudanese (22.6%, a difference of 0.41%), and British West Indian (22.8%, a difference of 0.52%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Senegalese are Immigrants from Micronesia (23.0%, a difference of 0.060%), Fijian (23.1%, a difference of 0.070%), Hmong (23.1%, a difference of 0.10%), Central American (23.0%, a difference of 0.27%), and Inupiat (23.1%, a difference of 0.35%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| Immigrants | Liberia | 0.9 /100 | #253 | Tragic 22.5% |
| Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 0.8 /100 | #254 | Tragic 22.6% |
| Immigrants | Sudan | 0.8 /100 | #255 | Tragic 22.6% |
| Immigrants | Belize | 0.8 /100 | #256 | Tragic 22.6% |
| Sudanese | 0.7 /100 | #257 | Tragic 22.6% |
| Bahamians | 0.6 /100 | #258 | Tragic 22.7% |
| Whites/Caucasians | 0.6 /100 | #259 | Tragic 22.7% |
| Celtics | 0.5 /100 | #260 | Tragic 22.7% |
| Immigrants | Cabo Verde | 0.4 /100 | #261 | Tragic 22.8% |
| British West Indians | 0.4 /100 | #262 | Tragic 22.8% |
| Scotch-Irish | 0.3 /100 | #263 | Tragic 22.9% |
| Immigrants | Laos | 0.3 /100 | #264 | Tragic 22.9% |
| Central Americans | 0.2 /100 | #265 | Tragic 23.0% |
| Immigrants | Micronesia | 0.2 /100 | #266 | Tragic 23.0% |
| Senegalese | 0.2 /100 | #267 | Tragic 23.0% |
| Fijians | 0.2 /100 | #268 | Tragic 23.1% |
| Hmong | 0.2 /100 | #269 | Tragic 23.1% |
| Inupiat | 0.2 /100 | #270 | Tragic 23.1% |
| Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.1 /100 | #271 | Tragic 23.2% |
| Immigrants | Senegal | 0.1 /100 | #272 | Tragic 23.2% |
| Alaska Natives | 0.1 /100 | #273 | Tragic 23.3% |