Celtic vs Inupiat Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Celtic
Inupiat
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Celtics
Inupiat
22.7%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
0.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
260th/ 347
METRIC RANK
23.1%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
0.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
270th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Celtic vs Inupiat Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 167,592,415 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Celtics and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.360 and weighted average of 22.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 95,986,972 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Inupiat and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.161 and weighted average of 23.1%, a difference of 1.8%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Celtic | Inupiat |
| Minimum | 11.1% | 8.3% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 73.6% |
| Range | 88.9% | 65.3% |
| Mean | 33.1% | 30.3% |
| Median | 27.8% | 24.4% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 22.5% | 17.1% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 39.6% | 40.1% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 17.1% | 23.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 16.9% | 18.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 16.7% | 18.4% |
Demographics Similar to Celtics and Inupiat by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Celtics are White/Caucasian (22.7%, a difference of 0.080%), Bahamian (22.7%, a difference of 0.21%), Immigrants from Cabo Verde (22.8%, a difference of 0.27%), Sudanese (22.6%, a difference of 0.41%), and British West Indian (22.8%, a difference of 0.52%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Inupiat are Subsaharan African (23.2%, a difference of 0.25%), Hmong (23.1%, a difference of 0.26%), Fijian (23.1%, a difference of 0.28%), Senegalese (23.0%, a difference of 0.35%), and Immigrants from Micronesia (23.0%, a difference of 0.41%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| Immigrants | Sudan | 0.8 /100 | #255 | Tragic 22.6% |
| Immigrants | Belize | 0.8 /100 | #256 | Tragic 22.6% |
| Sudanese | 0.7 /100 | #257 | Tragic 22.6% |
| Bahamians | 0.6 /100 | #258 | Tragic 22.7% |
| Whites/Caucasians | 0.6 /100 | #259 | Tragic 22.7% |
| Celtics | 0.5 /100 | #260 | Tragic 22.7% |
| Immigrants | Cabo Verde | 0.4 /100 | #261 | Tragic 22.8% |
| British West Indians | 0.4 /100 | #262 | Tragic 22.8% |
| Scotch-Irish | 0.3 /100 | #263 | Tragic 22.9% |
| Immigrants | Laos | 0.3 /100 | #264 | Tragic 22.9% |
| Central Americans | 0.2 /100 | #265 | Tragic 23.0% |
| Immigrants | Micronesia | 0.2 /100 | #266 | Tragic 23.0% |
| Senegalese | 0.2 /100 | #267 | Tragic 23.0% |
| Fijians | 0.2 /100 | #268 | Tragic 23.1% |
| Hmong | 0.2 /100 | #269 | Tragic 23.1% |
| Inupiat | 0.2 /100 | #270 | Tragic 23.1% |
| Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.1 /100 | #271 | Tragic 23.2% |
| Immigrants | Senegal | 0.1 /100 | #272 | Tragic 23.2% |
| Alaska Natives | 0.1 /100 | #273 | Tragic 23.3% |
| Marshallese | 0.1 /100 | #274 | Tragic 23.3% |
| Mexican American Indians | 0.1 /100 | #275 | Tragic 23.4% |