Celtic vs Bahamian Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Celtic
Bahamian
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Celtics
Bahamians
22.7%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
0.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
260th/ 347
METRIC RANK
22.7%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
0.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
258th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Celtic vs Bahamian Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 167,592,415 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Celtics and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.360 and weighted average of 22.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 112,361,785 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Bahamians and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.425 and weighted average of 22.7%, a difference of 0.21%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Celtic | Bahamian |
| Minimum | 11.1% | 8.3% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 64.6% |
| Range | 88.9% | 56.3% |
| Mean | 33.1% | 26.7% |
| Median | 27.8% | 22.7% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 22.5% | 20.2% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 39.6% | 31.5% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 17.1% | 11.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 16.9% | 10.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 16.7% | 10.8% |
Demographics Similar to Celtics and Bahamians by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Celtics are White/Caucasian (22.7%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Cabo Verde (22.8%, a difference of 0.27%), Sudanese (22.6%, a difference of 0.41%), British West Indian (22.8%, a difference of 0.52%), and Immigrants from Belize (22.6%, a difference of 0.56%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Bahamians are White/Caucasian (22.7%, a difference of 0.14%), Sudanese (22.6%, a difference of 0.20%), Immigrants from Belize (22.6%, a difference of 0.34%), Immigrants from Cabo Verde (22.8%, a difference of 0.48%), and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar (22.6%, a difference of 0.49%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| Immigrants | Caribbean | 1.3 /100 | #249 | Tragic 22.4% |
| Immigrants | Bahamas | 1.2 /100 | #250 | Tragic 22.5% |
| Immigrants | West Indies | 1.0 /100 | #251 | Tragic 22.5% |
| Delaware | 1.0 /100 | #252 | Tragic 22.5% |
| Immigrants | Liberia | 0.9 /100 | #253 | Tragic 22.5% |
| Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 0.8 /100 | #254 | Tragic 22.6% |
| Immigrants | Sudan | 0.8 /100 | #255 | Tragic 22.6% |
| Immigrants | Belize | 0.8 /100 | #256 | Tragic 22.6% |
| Sudanese | 0.7 /100 | #257 | Tragic 22.6% |
| Bahamians | 0.6 /100 | #258 | Tragic 22.7% |
| Whites/Caucasians | 0.6 /100 | #259 | Tragic 22.7% |
| Celtics | 0.5 /100 | #260 | Tragic 22.7% |
| Immigrants | Cabo Verde | 0.4 /100 | #261 | Tragic 22.8% |
| British West Indians | 0.4 /100 | #262 | Tragic 22.8% |
| Scotch-Irish | 0.3 /100 | #263 | Tragic 22.9% |
| Immigrants | Laos | 0.3 /100 | #264 | Tragic 22.9% |
| Central Americans | 0.2 /100 | #265 | Tragic 23.0% |
| Immigrants | Micronesia | 0.2 /100 | #266 | Tragic 23.0% |
| Senegalese | 0.2 /100 | #267 | Tragic 23.0% |
| Fijians | 0.2 /100 | #268 | Tragic 23.1% |
| Hmong | 0.2 /100 | #269 | Tragic 23.1% |