Celtic vs British West Indian Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Celtic
British West Indian
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Celtics
British West Indians
22.7%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
0.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
260th/ 347
METRIC RANK
22.8%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
0.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
262nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Celtic vs British West Indian Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 167,592,415 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Celtics and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.360 and weighted average of 22.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 151,955,879 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of British West Indians and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.128 and weighted average of 22.8%, a difference of 0.52%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Celtic | British West Indian |
| Minimum | 11.1% | 1.4% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 61.7% |
| Range | 88.9% | 60.3% |
| Mean | 33.1% | 22.6% |
| Median | 27.8% | 21.9% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 22.5% | 17.6% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 39.6% | 26.0% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 17.1% | 8.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 16.9% | 9.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 16.7% | 9.3% |
Demographics Similar to Celtics and British West Indians by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Celtics are White/Caucasian (22.7%, a difference of 0.080%), Bahamian (22.7%, a difference of 0.21%), Immigrants from Cabo Verde (22.8%, a difference of 0.27%), Sudanese (22.6%, a difference of 0.41%), and Immigrants from Belize (22.6%, a difference of 0.56%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to British West Indians are Immigrants from Cabo Verde (22.8%, a difference of 0.25%), Scotch-Irish (22.9%, a difference of 0.41%), Immigrants from Laos (22.9%, a difference of 0.48%), White/Caucasian (22.7%, a difference of 0.59%), and Central American (23.0%, a difference of 0.65%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| Immigrants | West Indies | 1.0 /100 | #251 | Tragic 22.5% |
| Delaware | 1.0 /100 | #252 | Tragic 22.5% |
| Immigrants | Liberia | 0.9 /100 | #253 | Tragic 22.5% |
| Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 0.8 /100 | #254 | Tragic 22.6% |
| Immigrants | Sudan | 0.8 /100 | #255 | Tragic 22.6% |
| Immigrants | Belize | 0.8 /100 | #256 | Tragic 22.6% |
| Sudanese | 0.7 /100 | #257 | Tragic 22.6% |
| Bahamians | 0.6 /100 | #258 | Tragic 22.7% |
| Whites/Caucasians | 0.6 /100 | #259 | Tragic 22.7% |
| Celtics | 0.5 /100 | #260 | Tragic 22.7% |
| Immigrants | Cabo Verde | 0.4 /100 | #261 | Tragic 22.8% |
| British West Indians | 0.4 /100 | #262 | Tragic 22.8% |
| Scotch-Irish | 0.3 /100 | #263 | Tragic 22.9% |
| Immigrants | Laos | 0.3 /100 | #264 | Tragic 22.9% |
| Central Americans | 0.2 /100 | #265 | Tragic 23.0% |
| Immigrants | Micronesia | 0.2 /100 | #266 | Tragic 23.0% |
| Senegalese | 0.2 /100 | #267 | Tragic 23.0% |
| Fijians | 0.2 /100 | #268 | Tragic 23.1% |
| Hmong | 0.2 /100 | #269 | Tragic 23.1% |
| Inupiat | 0.2 /100 | #270 | Tragic 23.1% |
| Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.1 /100 | #271 | Tragic 23.2% |