Barbadian vs New Zealander Married-Couple Family Poverty
COMPARE
Barbadian
New Zealander
Married-Couple Family Poverty
Married-Couple Family Poverty Comparison
Barbadians
New Zealanders
6.3%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
274th/ 347
METRIC RANK
4.4%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
99.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
69th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Barbadian vs New Zealander Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 140,986,203 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Barbadians and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.108 and weighted average of 6.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 106,591,527 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of New Zealanders and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.368 and weighted average of 4.4%, a difference of 41.3%.
Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Barbadian | New Zealander |
Minimum | 0.52% | 1.1% |
Maximum | 15.7% | 11.9% |
Range | 15.2% | 10.8% |
Mean | 6.0% | 4.4% |
Median | 5.5% | 3.8% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 3.5% | 2.3% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 7.2% | 5.5% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.7% | 3.2% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.6% | 2.8% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.5% | 2.8% |
Similar Demographics by Married-Couple Family Poverty
Demographics Similar to Barbadians by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Barbadians are Colville (6.3%, a difference of 0.050%), Choctaw (6.3%, a difference of 0.16%), Yaqui (6.3%, a difference of 0.62%), Indonesian (6.3%, a difference of 0.75%), and Trinidadian and Tobagonian (6.2%, a difference of 0.83%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
Spanish Americans | 0.2 /100 | #267 | Tragic 6.2% |
Alaska Natives | 0.2 /100 | #268 | Tragic 6.2% |
Immigrants | West Indies | 0.1 /100 | #269 | Tragic 6.2% |
Immigrants | Jamaica | 0.1 /100 | #270 | Tragic 6.2% |
Immigrants | Bahamas | 0.1 /100 | #271 | Tragic 6.2% |
Trinidadians and Tobagonians | 0.1 /100 | #272 | Tragic 6.2% |
Colville | 0.1 /100 | #273 | Tragic 6.3% |
Barbadians | 0.1 /100 | #274 | Tragic 6.3% |
Choctaw | 0.1 /100 | #275 | Tragic 6.3% |
Yaqui | 0.1 /100 | #276 | Tragic 6.3% |
Indonesians | 0.1 /100 | #277 | Tragic 6.3% |
Immigrants | Trinidad and Tobago | 0.1 /100 | #278 | Tragic 6.4% |
Houma | 0.0 /100 | #279 | Tragic 6.4% |
West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #280 | Tragic 6.4% |
Mexican American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #281 | Tragic 6.4% |
Demographics Similar to New Zealanders by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to New Zealanders are Slavic (4.4%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Canada (4.4%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Serbia (4.4%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Korea (4.5%, a difference of 0.13%), and Macedonian (4.4%, a difference of 0.20%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
Immigrants | Australia | 99.6 /100 | #62 | Exceptional 4.4% |
Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 99.6 /100 | #63 | Exceptional 4.4% |
Immigrants | Bulgaria | 99.5 /100 | #64 | Exceptional 4.4% |
Macedonians | 99.4 /100 | #65 | Exceptional 4.4% |
Immigrants | Serbia | 99.4 /100 | #66 | Exceptional 4.4% |
Immigrants | Canada | 99.4 /100 | #67 | Exceptional 4.4% |
Slavs | 99.4 /100 | #68 | Exceptional 4.4% |
New Zealanders | 99.4 /100 | #69 | Exceptional 4.4% |
Immigrants | Korea | 99.4 /100 | #70 | Exceptional 4.5% |
Immigrants | North America | 99.3 /100 | #71 | Exceptional 4.5% |
Immigrants | England | 99.3 /100 | #72 | Exceptional 4.5% |
Ukrainians | 99.2 /100 | #73 | Exceptional 4.5% |
Immigrants | Austria | 99.2 /100 | #74 | Exceptional 4.5% |
Cambodians | 99.2 /100 | #75 | Exceptional 4.5% |
Immigrants | South Africa | 99.1 /100 | #76 | Exceptional 4.5% |