Barbadian vs New Zealander Disability Age 35 to 64
COMPARE
Barbadian
New Zealander
Disability Age 35 to 64
Disability Age 35 to 64 Comparison
Barbadians
New Zealanders
11.8%
DISABILITY AGE 35 TO 64
9.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
217th/ 347
METRIC RANK
11.0%
DISABILITY AGE 35 TO 64
79.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
151st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Barbadian vs New Zealander Disability Age 35 to 64 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 141,271,675 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Barbadians and percentage of population with a disability between the ages 34 and 64 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.321 and weighted average of 11.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 106,896,274 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of New Zealanders and percentage of population with a disability between the ages 34 and 64 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.603 and weighted average of 11.0%, a difference of 7.4%.
Disability Age 35 to 64 Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Barbadian | New Zealander |
| Minimum | 1.4% | 0.65% |
| Maximum | 29.3% | 46.3% |
| Range | 27.9% | 45.6% |
| Mean | 13.0% | 14.5% |
| Median | 12.2% | 11.4% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 9.9% | 8.8% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 15.1% | 17.5% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.2% | 8.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.1% | 10.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.1% | 10.4% |
Similar Demographics by Disability Age 35 to 64
Demographics Similar to Barbadians by Disability Age 35 to 64
In terms of disability age 35 to 64, the demographic groups most similar to Barbadians are Immigrants from Bahamas (11.8%, a difference of 0.050%), Czechoslovakian (11.8%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from West Indies (11.8%, a difference of 0.14%), Alsatian (11.8%, a difference of 0.23%), and Honduran (11.8%, a difference of 0.25%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Disability Age 35 to 64 |
| Belgians | 13.1 /100 | #210 | Poor 11.7% |
| Canadians | 13.0 /100 | #211 | Poor 11.7% |
| Immigrants | Jamaica | 11.8 /100 | #212 | Poor 11.7% |
| Yugoslavians | 11.6 /100 | #213 | Poor 11.7% |
| Immigrants | Sudan | 11.4 /100 | #214 | Poor 11.7% |
| Spanish American Indians | 11.1 /100 | #215 | Poor 11.7% |
| Bahamians | 10.7 /100 | #216 | Poor 11.8% |
| Barbadians | 9.5 /100 | #217 | Tragic 11.8% |
| Immigrants | Bahamas | 9.2 /100 | #218 | Tragic 11.8% |
| Czechoslovakians | 9.0 /100 | #219 | Tragic 11.8% |
| Immigrants | West Indies | 8.9 /100 | #220 | Tragic 11.8% |
| Alsatians | 8.5 /100 | #221 | Tragic 11.8% |
| Hondurans | 8.4 /100 | #222 | Tragic 11.8% |
| Immigrants | Honduras | 8.4 /100 | #223 | Tragic 11.8% |
| Immigrants | Ghana | 7.8 /100 | #224 | Tragic 11.8% |
Demographics Similar to New Zealanders by Disability Age 35 to 64
In terms of disability age 35 to 64, the demographic groups most similar to New Zealanders are Syrian (11.0%, a difference of 0.060%), Ukrainian (11.0%, a difference of 0.16%), Immigrants from Cameroon (10.9%, a difference of 0.24%), Immigrants from England (11.0%, a difference of 0.24%), and Immigrants from Canada (11.0%, a difference of 0.31%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Disability Age 35 to 64 |
| Lithuanians | 88.7 /100 | #144 | Excellent 10.8% |
| Immigrants | Bangladesh | 85.6 /100 | #145 | Excellent 10.9% |
| South American Indians | 83.5 /100 | #146 | Excellent 10.9% |
| Immigrants | Eritrea | 83.4 /100 | #147 | Excellent 10.9% |
| Arabs | 82.7 /100 | #148 | Excellent 10.9% |
| Immigrants | Cameroon | 81.1 /100 | #149 | Excellent 10.9% |
| Syrians | 79.8 /100 | #150 | Good 11.0% |
| New Zealanders | 79.3 /100 | #151 | Good 11.0% |
| Ukrainians | 78.0 /100 | #152 | Good 11.0% |
| Immigrants | England | 77.4 /100 | #153 | Good 11.0% |
| Immigrants | Canada | 76.7 /100 | #154 | Good 11.0% |
| Moroccans | 76.4 /100 | #155 | Good 11.0% |
| Immigrants | Sierra Leone | 76.2 /100 | #156 | Good 11.0% |
| Guyanese | 75.1 /100 | #157 | Good 11.0% |
| Immigrants | North America | 74.9 /100 | #158 | Good 11.0% |