Sierra Leonean In Labor Force | Age 35-44
COMPARE
Sierra Leonean
Select to Compare
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Sierra Leonean In Labor Force | Age 35-44
86.4%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE 35-44
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
1st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Sierra Leonean In Labor Force | Age 35-44 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 83,346,691 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Sierra Leoneans and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 35 and 44 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.109 and weighted average of 86.4%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Sierra Leoneans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.32% in labor force participation rate among population between the ages 35 and 44.
It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Sierra Leoneans and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 35 and 44 does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Sierra Leoneans influences an upward or downward trend in the level of labor force participation rate among population between the ages 35 and 44 within an area, or if Sierra Leoneans simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of labor force participation rate among population between the ages 35 and 44 due to other factors.
Demographics Similar to Sierra Leoneans by In Labor Force | Age 35-44
In terms of in labor force | age 35-44, the demographic groups most similar to Sierra Leoneans are Luxembourger (86.4%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Bolivia (86.2%, a difference of 0.21%), Immigrants from Cabo Verde (86.2%, a difference of 0.24%), Zimbabwean (86.1%, a difference of 0.37%), and Bolivian (86.1%, a difference of 0.38%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | In Labor Force | Age 35-44 |
Sierra Leoneans | 100.0 /100 | #1 | Exceptional 86.4% |
Luxembourgers | 100.0 /100 | #2 | Exceptional 86.4% |
Immigrants from Bolivia | 100.0 /100 | #3 | Exceptional 86.2% |
Immigrants from Cabo Verde | 100.0 /100 | #4 | Exceptional 86.2% |
Zimbabweans | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 86.1% |
Bolivians | 100.0 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 86.1% |
Immigrants from Sierra Leone | 100.0 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 86.1% |
Immigrants from Ethiopia | 100.0 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 85.9% |
Ethiopians | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 85.9% |
Cape Verdeans | 100.0 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 85.8% |
Immigrants from Cameroon | 100.0 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 85.8% |
Liberians | 100.0 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 85.7% |
Somalis | 100.0 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 85.6% |
Immigrants from Somalia | 100.0 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 85.6% |
Norwegians | 100.0 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 85.6% |
Sierra Leonean In Labor Force | Age 35-44 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Sierra Leonean Data | In Labor Force | Age 35-44 Data |
Minimum | 0.013% | 68.6% |
Maximum | 7.5% | 100.0% |
Range | 7.5% | 31.4% |
Mean | 1.7% | 88.0% |
Median | 1.1% | 88.5% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 0.54% | 85.1% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 2.1% | 90.5% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.6% | 5.4% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.7% | 4.9% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.7% | 4.8% |
Correlation Details
Sierra Leonean Percentile | Sample Size | In Labor Force | Age 35-44 |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.013% | 57,500,714 | 83.8% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.055% | 11,196,430 | 85.1% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.092% | 2,821,159 | 85.4% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.13% | 1,829,461 | 85.0% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.17% | 2,275,579 | 86.1% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.21% | 1,138,077 | 85.1% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.24% | 1,071,225 | 85.3% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.28% | 753,216 | 84.9% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.32% | 483,134 | 89.3% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.36% | 470,594 | 85.4% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.39% | 564,960 | 84.4% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.43% | 464,114 | 86.0% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.47% | 236,920 | 84.2% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.51% | 206,870 | 87.8% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.54% | 156,129 | 87.8% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.57% | 408,817 | 88.8% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.63% | 117,910 | 79.4% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.66% | 234,227 | 86.4% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.69% | 144,320 | 85.0% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.73% | 103,153 | 88.5% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.77% | 128,411 | 87.7% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.81% | 111,770 | 89.7% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.85% | 52,356 | 83.9% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.87% | 134,170 | 87.5% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.92% | 60,683 | 88.5% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.96% | 45,555 | 90.5% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.00% | 40,751 | 88.5% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.05% | 50,692 | 86.2% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.11% | 74,275 | 92.2% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.13% | 13,425 | 92.5% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.27% | 48,563 | 84.7% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.29% | 17,875 | 93.1% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.33% | 4,950 | 94.0% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.38% | 13,982 | 91.9% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.42% | 9,835 | 90.1% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.44% | 38,295 | 86.0% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.47% | 9,527 | 89.6% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.55% | 26,253 | 93.7% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.65% | 15,244 | 87.2% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.68% | 9,024 | 88.6% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.77% | 7,515 | 88.9% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.85% | 11,455 | 92.5% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.01% | 19,369 | 91.0% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.06% | 43,797 | 90.3% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.13% | 7,168 | 89.3% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.25% | 1,599 | 87.5% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.50% | 9,037 | 68.6% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.89% | 14,901 | 97.2% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 3.00% | 31,018 | 83.2% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.03% | 9,183 | 91.4% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.06% | 52,373 | 89.2% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.64% | 4,226 | 94.7% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.31% | 1,924 | 100.0% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.33% | 19,465 | 94.4% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.65% | 5,976 | 94.6% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.54% | 18,104 | 90.3% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.81% | 3,287 | 89.3% |
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.02% | 2,026 | 81.1% |
[ 7.5% - 8.0% ] 7.52% | 1,623 | 76.8% |