Egyptian In Labor Force | Age 35-44
COMPARE
Egyptian
Select to Compare
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Egyptian In Labor Force | Age 35-44
84.8%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE 35-44
96.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
97th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Egyptian In Labor Force | Age 35-44 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 276,798,546 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Egyptians and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 35 and 44 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.502 and weighted average of 84.8%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Egyptians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.57% in labor force participation rate among population between the ages 35 and 44.
It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Egyptians and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 35 and 44 does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Egyptians influences an upward or downward trend in the level of labor force participation rate among population between the ages 35 and 44 within an area, or if Egyptians simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of labor force participation rate among population between the ages 35 and 44 due to other factors.
Demographics Similar to Egyptians by In Labor Force | Age 35-44
In terms of in labor force | age 35-44, the demographic groups most similar to Egyptians are Immigrants from Kuwait (84.8%, a difference of 0.0%), Cuban (84.8%, a difference of 0.0%), Mongolian (84.8%, a difference of 0.010%), Indian (Asian) (84.8%, a difference of 0.020%), and Immigrants from Europe (84.9%, a difference of 0.030%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | In Labor Force | Age 35-44 |
Immigrants from France | 97.4 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 84.9% |
Immigrants from Europe | 97.2 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 84.9% |
Ghanaians | 97.2 /100 | #92 | Exceptional 84.8% |
Immigrants from Northern Africa | 97.1 /100 | #93 | Exceptional 84.8% |
Mongolians | 96.8 /100 | #94 | Exceptional 84.8% |
Immigrants from Kuwait | 96.7 /100 | #95 | Exceptional 84.8% |
Cubans | 96.6 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 84.8% |
Egyptians | 96.6 /100 | #97 | Exceptional 84.8% |
Indians (Asian) | 96.1 /100 | #98 | Exceptional 84.8% |
Haitians | 96.0 /100 | #99 | Exceptional 84.8% |
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia | 95.9 /100 | #100 | Exceptional 84.8% |
Immigrants from Australia | 95.5 /100 | #101 | Exceptional 84.8% |
Immigrants from Southern Europe | 95.3 /100 | #102 | Exceptional 84.8% |
Immigrants from Belarus | 95.3 /100 | #103 | Exceptional 84.8% |
Immigrants from Sweden | 95.2 /100 | #104 | Exceptional 84.8% |
Egyptian In Labor Force | Age 35-44 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Egyptian Data | In Labor Force | Age 35-44 Data |
Minimum | 0.048% | 67.5% |
Maximum | 21.9% | 100.0% |
Range | 21.8% | 32.5% |
Mean | 5.1% | 86.5% |
Median | 3.4% | 85.5% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 1.6% | 84.4% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 6.2% | 87.8% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.6% | 3.5% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.2% | 5.9% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.2% | 5.9% |
Correlation Details
Egyptian Percentile | Sample Size | In Labor Force | Age 35-44 |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.048% | 148,552,010 | 83.8% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.16% | 57,329,298 | 84.8% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.27% | 20,111,718 | 84.9% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.36% | 22,776,013 | 84.5% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.49% | 7,452,122 | 85.5% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.60% | 4,831,139 | 85.2% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.70% | 3,224,368 | 84.9% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.82% | 2,417,282 | 85.7% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.93% | 1,797,091 | 85.5% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.04% | 1,982,578 | 84.9% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.14% | 855,863 | 84.8% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.25% | 676,576 | 85.0% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.35% | 775,907 | 84.8% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.48% | 391,296 | 86.2% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.59% | 416,568 | 86.1% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.69% | 513,256 | 84.8% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.80% | 291,026 | 83.1% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.89% | 742,845 | 85.6% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.04% | 262,183 | 85.5% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.16% | 122,258 | 82.9% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.27% | 28,023 | 91.3% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.37% | 77,570 | 89.9% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.51% | 9,255 | 90.8% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.58% | 159,607 | 82.3% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.66% | 145,756 | 85.9% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.79% | 96,434 | 86.3% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.90% | 3,965 | 79.5% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.03% | 77,913 | 86.8% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.10% | 113,952 | 86.9% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.25% | 9,596 | 85.5% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.38% | 5,444 | 91.8% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.53% | 18,673 | 84.6% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.70% | 81 | 87.0% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.83% | 58,053 | 80.2% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.01% | 5,835 | 81.5% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.09% | 60,303 | 88.9% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.22% | 13,070 | 84.3% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.44% | 36,823 | 90.2% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.52% | 155 | 95.7% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.67% | 52,230 | 78.0% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.79% | 4,782 | 78.7% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.13% | 99,800 | 87.8% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.49% | 601 | 81.5% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.61% | 659 | 85.7% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.99% | 3,553 | 67.5% |
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.10% | 6,952 | 98.5% |
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.36% | 14,518 | 83.4% |
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.59% | 8,410 | 85.5% |
[ 7.0% - 7.5% ] 7.17% | 7,017 | 85.1% |
[ 8.0% - 8.5% ] 8.20% | 140,994 | 83.3% |
[ 8.5% - 9.0% ] 8.83% | 1,155 | 96.2% |
[ 8.5% - 9.0% ] 8.89% | 1,429 | 74.5% |
[ 8.5% - 9.0% ] 8.97% | 747 | 84.9% |
[ 10.0% - 10.5% ] 10.02% | 5,751 | 86.8% |
[ 10.0% - 10.5% ] 10.44% | 5,000 | 93.9% |
[ 13.0% - 13.5% ] 13.49% | 1,394 | 87.9% |
[ 17.0% - 17.5% ] 17.50% | 120 | 100.0% |
[ 18.0% - 18.5% ] 18.26% | 241 | 100.0% |
[ 19.0% - 19.5% ] 19.16% | 981 | 87.5% |
[ 20.0% - 20.5% ] 20.38% | 211 | 100.0% |
[ 21.5% - 22.0% ] 21.88% | 96 | 100.0% |