Choctaw Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 75
COMPARE
Choctaw
Select to Compare
Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 75
Choctaw Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 75
12.5%
POVERTY | SENIORS > 75
20.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
192nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Choctaw Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 75 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 267,399,260 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Choctaw and poverty level among seniors over the age of 75 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.532 and weighted average of 12.5%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Choctaw within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.56% in poverty level among seniors over the age of 75.
It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Choctaw and poverty level among seniors over the age of 75 does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Choctaw influences an upward or downward trend in the level of poverty level among seniors over the age of 75 within an area, or if Choctaw simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of poverty level among seniors over the age of 75 due to other factors.
Demographics Similar to Choctaw by Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 75
In terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75, the demographic groups most similar to Choctaw are Taiwanese (12.6%, a difference of 0.31%), Alsatian (12.6%, a difference of 0.32%), Liberian (12.5%, a difference of 0.35%), Immigrants from France (12.6%, a difference of 0.37%), and Immigrants from Congo (12.5%, a difference of 0.42%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 75 |
| Immigrants from Malaysia | 35.8 /100 | #185 | Fair 12.3% |
| Sri Lankans | 32.3 /100 | #186 | Fair 12.4% |
| Yaqui | 25.9 /100 | #187 | Fair 12.5% |
| Immigrants from Northern Africa | 25.2 /100 | #188 | Fair 12.5% |
| Immigrants from Indonesia | 24.4 /100 | #189 | Fair 12.5% |
| Immigrants from Congo | 23.9 /100 | #190 | Fair 12.5% |
| Liberians | 23.2 /100 | #191 | Fair 12.5% |
| Choctaw | 20.2 /100 | #192 | Fair 12.5% |
| Taiwanese | 17.8 /100 | #193 | Poor 12.6% |
| Alsatians | 17.7 /100 | #194 | Poor 12.6% |
| Immigrants from France | 17.4 /100 | #195 | Poor 12.6% |
| Immigrants from Eastern Europe | 16.0 /100 | #196 | Poor 12.6% |
| Nepalese | 14.4 /100 | #197 | Poor 12.6% |
| Chileans | 13.7 /100 | #198 | Poor 12.6% |
| Immigrants from Lebanon | 12.7 /100 | #199 | Poor 12.7% |
Choctaw Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 75 Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Choctaw Data | Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 75 Data |
| Minimum | 0.081% | 4.2% |
| Maximum | 80.4% | 100.0% |
| Range | 80.3% | 95.8% |
| Mean | 18.3% | 20.9% |
| Median | 16.3% | 15.6% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 8.1% | 11.6% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 24.3% | 25.5% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 16.2% | 13.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 14.8% | 15.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 14.7% | 15.6% |
Correlation Details
| Choctaw Percentile | Sample Size | Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 75 |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.081% | 254,547,572 | 12.2% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.71% | 6,183,812 | 11.8% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.22% | 2,934,415 | 10.1% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.70% | 1,630,478 | 9.6% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.17% | 539,346 | 9.2% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.59% | 401,665 | 9.6% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.18% | 210,302 | 16.6% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.67% | 146,556 | 11.2% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.07% | 97,693 | 8.1% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.54% | 42,338 | 17.9% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.10% | 41,705 | 11.6% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.63% | 32,491 | 22.9% |
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.12% | 21,460 | 11.9% |
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.70% | 94,911 | 11.3% |
[ 7.0% - 7.5% ] 7.19% | 39,149 | 14.4% |
[ 7.5% - 8.0% ] 7.59% | 23,253 | 15.6% |
[ 8.0% - 8.5% ] 8.08% | 13,583 | 25.5% |
[ 8.5% - 9.0% ] 8.60% | 25,205 | 15.1% |
[ 9.0% - 9.5% ] 9.19% | 1,958 | 11.7% |
[ 9.5% - 10.0% ] 9.55% | 8,316 | 21.0% |
[ 9.5% - 10.0% ] 9.87% | 28,495 | 12.4% |
[ 10.5% - 11.0% ] 10.58% | 13,048 | 17.4% |
[ 10.5% - 11.0% ] 10.94% | 4,316 | 13.2% |
[ 11.0% - 11.5% ] 11.40% | 14,971 | 9.3% |
[ 12.0% - 12.5% ] 12.08% | 64,222 | 13.8% |
[ 12.5% - 13.0% ] 12.58% | 9,056 | 7.7% |
[ 12.5% - 13.0% ] 12.88% | 3,425 | 24.0% |
[ 13.0% - 13.5% ] 13.41% | 5,698 | 10.5% |
[ 14.0% - 14.5% ] 14.09% | 6,119 | 34.2% |
[ 14.0% - 14.5% ] 14.38% | 29,710 | 12.9% |
[ 15.0% - 15.5% ] 15.07% | 23,591 | 15.8% |
[ 15.0% - 15.5% ] 15.34% | 1,278 | 27.6% |
[ 15.5% - 16.0% ] 15.97% | 3,556 | 11.4% |
[ 16.5% - 17.0% ] 16.55% | 17,799 | 20.6% |
[ 16.5% - 17.0% ] 16.88% | 13,891 | 24.2% |
[ 17.0% - 17.5% ] 17.36% | 7,640 | 11.7% |
[ 17.5% - 18.0% ] 17.78% | 9,509 | 26.6% |
[ 18.0% - 18.5% ] 18.29% | 8,584 | 24.4% |
[ 18.5% - 19.0% ] 18.81% | 489 | 63.6% |
[ 19.0% - 19.5% ] 19.45% | 45,098 | 14.0% |
[ 19.5% - 20.0% ] 19.93% | 3,869 | 6.0% |
[ 20.0% - 20.5% ] 20.36% | 7,885 | 20.5% |
[ 20.5% - 21.0% ] 20.65% | 3,002 | 15.0% |
[ 21.0% - 21.5% ] 21.44% | 1,208 | 39.3% |
[ 21.5% - 22.0% ] 21.77% | 6,697 | 11.0% |
[ 22.5% - 23.0% ] 22.52% | 666 | 5.4% |
[ 22.5% - 23.0% ] 22.95% | 4,021 | 24.3% |
[ 23.0% - 23.5% ] 23.37% | 2,045 | 30.7% |
[ 23.5% - 24.0% ] 23.88% | 356 | 35.1% |
[ 24.0% - 24.5% ] 24.32% | 2,315 | 4.2% |
[ 25.0% - 25.5% ] 25.01% | 3,327 | 23.8% |
[ 25.5% - 26.0% ] 25.68% | 296 | 60.0% |
[ 26.5% - 27.0% ] 26.83% | 2,602 | 15.5% |
[ 27.0% - 27.5% ] 27.24% | 1,799 | 12.3% |
[ 27.5% - 28.0% ] 27.75% | 2,115 | 34.4% |
[ 29.0% - 29.5% ] 29.15% | 1,187 | 19.0% |
[ 29.5% - 30.0% ] 29.70% | 101 | 47.4% |
[ 30.0% - 30.5% ] 30.20% | 1,076 | 41.4% |
[ 32.0% - 32.5% ] 32.21% | 447 | 28.3% |
[ 32.5% - 33.0% ] 32.53% | 621 | 33.8% |
[ 34.5% - 35.0% ] 34.75% | 141 | 31.6% |
[ 35.5% - 36.0% ] 35.58% | 579 | 6.2% |
[ 38.0% - 38.5% ] 38.00% | 150 | 33.3% |
[ 45.0% - 45.5% ] 45.40% | 1,240 | 17.9% |
[ 75.0% - 75.5% ] 75.03% | 4,298 | 12.5% |
[ 80.0% - 80.5% ] 80.35% | 514 | 100.0% |