Choctaw In Labor Force | Age 16-19
COMPARE
Choctaw
Select to Compare
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Choctaw In Labor Force | Age 16-19
38.0%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE 16-19
95.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
127th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Choctaw In Labor Force | Age 16-19 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 269,371,385 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Choctaw and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 16 and 19 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.210 and weighted average of 38.0%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Choctaw within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.14% in labor force participation rate among population between the ages 16 and 19.
It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Choctaw and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 16 and 19 does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Choctaw influences an upward or downward trend in the level of labor force participation rate among population between the ages 16 and 19 within an area, or if Choctaw simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of labor force participation rate among population between the ages 16 and 19 due to other factors.
Demographics Similar to Choctaw by In Labor Force | Age 16-19
In terms of in labor force | age 16-19, the demographic groups most similar to Choctaw are New Zealander (38.0%, a difference of 0.0%), African (38.0%, a difference of 0.010%), Spaniard (38.0%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Zimbabwe (38.0%, a difference of 0.060%), and Immigrants from Austria (37.9%, a difference of 0.15%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | In Labor Force | Age 16-19 |
Ukrainians | 97.6 /100 | #120 | Exceptional 38.3% |
Ethiopians | 97.4 /100 | #121 | Exceptional 38.2% |
Guamanians/Chamorros | 97.4 /100 | #122 | Exceptional 38.2% |
Seminole | 96.7 /100 | #123 | Exceptional 38.1% |
Immigrants from England | 96.4 /100 | #124 | Exceptional 38.1% |
Immigrants from Africa | 96.1 /100 | #125 | Exceptional 38.0% |
Africans | 95.6 /100 | #126 | Exceptional 38.0% |
Choctaw | 95.6 /100 | #127 | Exceptional 38.0% |
New Zealanders | 95.6 /100 | #128 | Exceptional 38.0% |
Spaniards | 95.5 /100 | #129 | Exceptional 38.0% |
Immigrants from Zimbabwe | 95.4 /100 | #130 | Exceptional 38.0% |
Immigrants from Austria | 95.0 /100 | #131 | Exceptional 37.9% |
Immigrants from Oceania | 94.7 /100 | #132 | Exceptional 37.9% |
Cheyenne | 94.6 /100 | #133 | Exceptional 37.9% |
Immigrants from Netherlands | 93.7 /100 | #134 | Exceptional 37.8% |
Choctaw In Labor Force | Age 16-19 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Choctaw Data | In Labor Force | Age 16-19 Data |
Minimum | 0.081% | 6.9% |
Maximum | 98.1% | 61.9% |
Range | 98.1% | 55.0% |
Mean | 19.9% | 33.8% |
Median | 16.7% | 35.1% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 8.4% | 27.0% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 26.1% | 39.9% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 17.7% | 12.8% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 17.8% | 11.5% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 17.6% | 11.5% |
Correlation Details
Choctaw Percentile | Sample Size | In Labor Force | Age 16-19 |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.081% | 256,077,164 | 37.8% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.70% | 6,452,440 | 40.4% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.22% | 3,014,837 | 41.3% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.70% | 1,658,768 | 42.7% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.17% | 563,429 | 39.9% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.60% | 413,020 | 39.8% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.18% | 212,104 | 33.2% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.67% | 153,060 | 36.3% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.07% | 101,010 | 40.6% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.56% | 41,013 | 37.3% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.10% | 40,715 | 30.3% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.62% | 33,527 | 38.4% |
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.12% | 21,815 | 40.9% |
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.70% | 95,361 | 36.6% |
[ 7.0% - 7.5% ] 7.18% | 41,287 | 40.0% |
[ 7.5% - 8.0% ] 7.59% | 24,079 | 33.9% |
[ 8.0% - 8.5% ] 8.09% | 14,090 | 36.5% |
[ 8.5% - 9.0% ] 8.61% | 26,328 | 31.0% |
[ 9.0% - 9.5% ] 9.15% | 4,274 | 35.2% |
[ 9.5% - 10.0% ] 9.54% | 10,184 | 40.7% |
[ 9.5% - 10.0% ] 9.87% | 28,404 | 33.4% |
[ 10.5% - 11.0% ] 10.58% | 13,422 | 31.9% |
[ 10.5% - 11.0% ] 10.92% | 3,854 | 29.4% |
[ 11.0% - 11.5% ] 11.41% | 16,024 | 45.4% |
[ 12.0% - 12.5% ] 12.09% | 64,662 | 36.1% |
[ 12.5% - 13.0% ] 12.56% | 10,477 | 25.2% |
[ 12.5% - 13.0% ] 12.84% | 4,402 | 35.3% |
[ 13.0% - 13.5% ] 13.41% | 5,519 | 61.7% |
[ 14.0% - 14.5% ] 14.09% | 6,119 | 15.8% |
[ 14.0% - 14.5% ] 14.38% | 29,627 | 34.7% |
[ 15.0% - 15.5% ] 15.06% | 24,496 | 33.5% |
[ 15.0% - 15.5% ] 15.36% | 1,458 | 59.7% |
[ 15.5% - 16.0% ] 15.97% | 3,669 | 21.9% |
[ 16.5% - 17.0% ] 16.55% | 17,945 | 35.8% |
[ 16.5% - 17.0% ] 16.88% | 14,067 | 37.6% |
[ 17.0% - 17.5% ] 17.35% | 7,872 | 46.4% |
[ 17.5% - 18.0% ] 17.78% | 9,509 | 37.3% |
[ 18.0% - 18.5% ] 18.28% | 9,031 | 37.6% |
[ 18.5% - 19.0% ] 18.72% | 219 | 20.0% |
[ 19.0% - 19.5% ] 19.45% | 45,234 | 32.6% |
[ 19.5% - 20.0% ] 19.93% | 3,869 | 32.5% |
[ 20.0% - 20.5% ] 20.36% | 7,885 | 27.4% |
[ 20.5% - 21.0% ] 20.65% | 3,002 | 42.9% |
[ 21.0% - 21.5% ] 21.44% | 1,208 | 22.2% |
[ 21.5% - 22.0% ] 21.75% | 10,823 | 48.1% |
[ 22.5% - 23.0% ] 22.52% | 746 | 34.6% |
[ 22.5% - 23.0% ] 22.95% | 4,021 | 35.1% |
[ 23.0% - 23.5% ] 23.37% | 2,045 | 37.1% |
[ 24.0% - 24.5% ] 24.32% | 2,315 | 23.7% |
[ 25.0% - 25.5% ] 25.01% | 3,327 | 22.0% |
[ 25.5% - 26.0% ] 25.68% | 296 | 37.5% |
[ 26.0% - 26.5% ] 26.46% | 223 | 26.7% |
[ 26.5% - 27.0% ] 26.83% | 2,602 | 32.4% |
[ 27.0% - 27.5% ] 27.25% | 1,222 | 35.1% |
[ 27.5% - 28.0% ] 27.76% | 1,974 | 23.6% |
[ 28.0% - 28.5% ] 28.36% | 871 | 13.8% |
[ 29.0% - 29.5% ] 29.15% | 1,187 | 7.4% |
[ 30.0% - 30.5% ] 30.18% | 1,196 | 21.8% |
[ 32.0% - 32.5% ] 32.21% | 447 | 32.9% |
[ 32.0% - 32.5% ] 32.50% | 240 | 61.9% |
[ 35.5% - 36.0% ] 35.58% | 579 | 28.0% |
[ 36.5% - 37.0% ] 36.54% | 156 | 25.0% |
[ 37.5% - 38.0% ] 37.88% | 132 | 15.4% |
[ 43.0% - 43.5% ] 43.42% | 76 | 50.0% |
[ 45.0% - 45.5% ] 45.40% | 1,240 | 6.9% |
[ 75.0% - 75.5% ] 75.03% | 4,298 | 8.4% |
[ 80.0% - 80.5% ] 80.35% | 514 | 20.0% |
[ 98.0% - 98.5% ] 98.14% | 376 | 59.6% |