Sri Lankan vs Soviet Union Female Poverty
COMPARE
Sri Lankan
Soviet Union
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Sri Lankans
Soviet Union
12.7%
FEMALE POVERTY
90.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
118th/ 347
METRIC RANK
12.6%
FEMALE POVERTY
92.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
111th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Sri Lankan vs Soviet Union Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 440,042,655 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Sri Lankans and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.422 and weighted average of 12.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 43,449,399 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Soviet Union and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.106 and weighted average of 12.6%, a difference of 0.52%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Sri Lankan | Soviet Union |
| Minimum | 1.2% | 0.56% |
| Maximum | 62.5% | 26.3% |
| Range | 61.3% | 25.7% |
| Mean | 14.0% | 9.6% |
| Median | 12.5% | 9.2% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 10.3% | 5.7% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 15.8% | 12.7% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.5% | 7.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 8.1% | 5.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 8.0% | 5.1% |
Demographics Similar to Sri Lankans and Soviet Union by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Sri Lankans are Albanian (12.7%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Southern Europe (12.7%, a difference of 0.020%), New Zealander (12.7%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Russia (12.7%, a difference of 0.090%), and Immigrants from Hungary (12.7%, a difference of 0.17%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Soviet Union are Immigrants from Israel (12.6%, a difference of 0.14%), Canadian (12.7%, a difference of 0.17%), Paraguayan (12.6%, a difference of 0.22%), Immigrants from Zimbabwe (12.6%, a difference of 0.25%), and Portuguese (12.6%, a difference of 0.27%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Palestinians | 94.3 /100 | #104 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Scottish | 94.1 /100 | #105 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Immigrants | Turkey | 93.8 /100 | #106 | Exceptional 12.6% |
| Laotians | 93.4 /100 | #107 | Exceptional 12.6% |
| Portuguese | 93.1 /100 | #108 | Exceptional 12.6% |
| Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 93.1 /100 | #109 | Exceptional 12.6% |
| Paraguayans | 93.0 /100 | #110 | Exceptional 12.6% |
| Soviet Union | 92.4 /100 | #111 | Exceptional 12.6% |
| Immigrants | Israel | 92.0 /100 | #112 | Exceptional 12.6% |
| Canadians | 92.0 /100 | #113 | Exceptional 12.7% |
| Welsh | 91.6 /100 | #114 | Exceptional 12.7% |
| Puget Sound Salish | 91.5 /100 | #115 | Exceptional 12.7% |
| Immigrants | Russia | 91.2 /100 | #116 | Exceptional 12.7% |
| Immigrants | Southern Europe | 90.9 /100 | #117 | Exceptional 12.7% |
| Sri Lankans | 90.9 /100 | #118 | Exceptional 12.7% |
| Albanians | 90.8 /100 | #119 | Exceptional 12.7% |
| New Zealanders | 90.6 /100 | #120 | Exceptional 12.7% |
| Immigrants | Hungary | 90.3 /100 | #121 | Exceptional 12.7% |
| French Canadians | 90.2 /100 | #122 | Exceptional 12.7% |
| Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 89.9 /100 | #123 | Excellent 12.7% |
| Immigrants | Norway | 89.3 /100 | #124 | Excellent 12.8% |