Sri Lankan vs Chilean Female Poverty
COMPARE
Sri Lankan
Chilean
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Sri Lankans
Chileans
12.7%
FEMALE POVERTY
90.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
118th/ 347
METRIC RANK
12.9%
FEMALE POVERTY
84.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
137th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Sri Lankan vs Chilean Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 440,042,655 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Sri Lankans and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.422 and weighted average of 12.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 256,534,344 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Chileans and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.226 and weighted average of 12.9%, a difference of 1.5%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Sri Lankan | Chilean |
Minimum | 1.2% | 2.5% |
Maximum | 62.5% | 25.4% |
Range | 61.3% | 22.9% |
Mean | 14.0% | 11.0% |
Median | 12.5% | 11.6% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 10.3% | 7.8% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 15.8% | 12.5% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.5% | 4.7% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 8.1% | 5.2% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 8.0% | 5.1% |
Demographics Similar to Sri Lankans and Chileans by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Sri Lankans are Albanian (12.7%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Southern Europe (12.7%, a difference of 0.020%), New Zealander (12.7%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Hungary (12.7%, a difference of 0.17%), and French Canadian (12.7%, a difference of 0.21%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Chileans are Peruvian (12.9%, a difference of 0.090%), French (12.9%, a difference of 0.17%), Immigrants from Switzerland (12.9%, a difference of 0.22%), Immigrants from Western Europe (12.8%, a difference of 0.38%), and Immigrants from Jordan (12.8%, a difference of 0.45%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
Immigrants | Southern Europe | 90.9 /100 | #117 | Exceptional 12.7% |
Sri Lankans | 90.9 /100 | #118 | Exceptional 12.7% |
Albanians | 90.8 /100 | #119 | Exceptional 12.7% |
New Zealanders | 90.6 /100 | #120 | Exceptional 12.7% |
Immigrants | Hungary | 90.3 /100 | #121 | Exceptional 12.7% |
French Canadians | 90.2 /100 | #122 | Exceptional 12.7% |
Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 89.9 /100 | #123 | Excellent 12.7% |
Immigrants | Norway | 89.3 /100 | #124 | Excellent 12.8% |
Argentineans | 89.1 /100 | #125 | Excellent 12.8% |
Immigrants | Ukraine | 88.8 /100 | #126 | Excellent 12.8% |
South Africans | 88.4 /100 | #127 | Excellent 12.8% |
Immigrants | Belarus | 88.2 /100 | #128 | Excellent 12.8% |
Immigrants | Brazil | 87.9 /100 | #129 | Excellent 12.8% |
Immigrants | Vietnam | 87.1 /100 | #130 | Excellent 12.8% |
Immigrants | Argentina | 87.0 /100 | #131 | Excellent 12.8% |
Immigrants | Jordan | 86.9 /100 | #132 | Excellent 12.8% |
Immigrants | Western Europe | 86.6 /100 | #133 | Excellent 12.8% |
Immigrants | Switzerland | 85.8 /100 | #134 | Excellent 12.9% |
French | 85.6 /100 | #135 | Excellent 12.9% |
Peruvians | 85.2 /100 | #136 | Excellent 12.9% |
Chileans | 84.7 /100 | #137 | Excellent 12.9% |